Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 262 No 7035 p325-327
March 06, 1999 Continuing education

DRUG INTERACTIONS THAT MATTER

(4) Anticonvulsants

By Adrian M. Brown, MSc, MRPharmS

Many drug-drug interactions can accompany the use of anticonvulsants. As these agents are often used in combination, the addition of a second drug to a patient’s therapy may alter the plasma level of the initial treatment. This article discusses the principles underlying some important interactions

Other articles in this series include:
Antiarrhythmics (PJ, July 3, 1999, pp28-31)
Antihypertensives (PJ, April 17, pp547-51)

Credit for learning: 1
This article will form the basis of questions under the PJ/College of Pharmacy Practice Credit for Learning Scheme

Anticonvulsants have been associated with a wide range of drug-drug interactions in clinical use. Many drugs can affect the actions of anticonvulsants and vice versa. Interactions with anticonvulsants are usually pharmacokinetic in nature, although the precise mechanisms of many reported interactions are unclear. Anticonvulsants often have a narrow therapeutic index. An interacting drug which increases or decreases an anticonvulsant’s plasma level is likely to cause toxicity or loss of therapeutic control, respectively.
Because so many drug-drug interactions for anticonvulsants have been documented, it is not possible to discuss all of them within this article. Instead, the article focuses on the underlying principles of some important interactions encountered in practice, and summarises the implications of drug-drug interactions where two anticonvulsants are used together.

SITUATIONS WHERE DRUGS AFFECT THE ACTIONS OF ANTICONVULSANTS.

(a) Reduction of bioavailability A co-administered drug may reduce bioavailability of an anticonvulsant in several ways. It may affect the pH of the gastric or intestinal secretions such that the ionic characteristics of the drug alters. For example, oral phenytoin is less ionised and hence absorbed more effectively in an acid environment than in a neutral or alkaline one. Antacids have been shown to reduce the bioavailablity of phenytoin, perhaps by as much as 30 per cent.1 If an antacid is required by a patient taking phenytoin, it seems wise not to administer the agents within an hour of each other.
Some drugs may form insoluble complexes with an anticonvulsant, thereby reducing oral absorption. Acetazolamide has been reported to reduce the absorption of primidone, presumably by this mechanism.2
The absorption of phenytoin is known to be reduced when given to patients receiving enteral feeds. This is considered to be due to complex formation of phenytoin with constituents of the nutritional product, but patients receiving parenteral nutrition have also been shown to have reduced bioavailability of oral phenytoin. The mechanism for this latter phenomenon remains unclear.3

(b) Effects of drugs on the distribution characteristics of anticonvulsants Anticonvulsants vary considerably in relation to how they distribute throughout body fluids and tissues following absorption. Moreover, some agents may be highly bound to plasma proteins. There is potential for many co-administered drugs to interfere with these characteristics. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of both drugs is required to anticipate whether problems are likely when they are taken together. In general, an interaction involving alteration of an anticonvulsant’s distribution is only likely to be of clinical significance if there is also an effect on the drug’s elimination.

Displacement from plasma protein binding sites - Several anticonvulsants are extensively bound to plasma proteins, and are subject to displacement by other drugs which compete for their binding sites. Phenytoin, for example, is normally 90 per cent protein bound, mainly to serum albumin. Many acidic drugs (eg, salicylates, sodium valproate, some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, warfarin) are also strongly bound to albumin, and displacement of phenytoin can occur when such drugs are started in a patient maintained on phenytoin. The effect of a displacement interaction is normally a transient increase in concentration of free (unbound) phenytoin, which then becomes available to leave the bloodstream to distribute to peripheral tissue sites, and to the liver, which is the main organ of elimination of phenytoin. The net result of these changes is usually a reduction in the total phenytoin plasma concentration, although the free drug concentration (the therapeutically active moiety) is minimally affected.
The main clinical problem arising from this type of interaction is that the fall in measured phenytoin may be misinterpreted as a need to increase dosage, and thereby increase the risk of phenytoin toxicity. The process and its clinical implications are summarised in the case study (above).

(c) Interference with the hepatic metabolism of an anticonvulsant by a co-administered drug This type of interaction is one of the most commonly encountered in clinical practice. Many anticonvulsants are extensively metabolised by cytochrome P450 mediated oxidation pathways. The clearance of these drugs may be enhanced by agents which induce the synthesis of enzymes involved in these processes, or may be decreased by drugs which inhibit the activity of these enzymes. Some anticonvulsants are themselves enzyme inducing agents (phenytoin, carbamazepine) or enzyme inhibitors (sodium valproate). As anticonvulsants are frequently used in combination, one agent can often affect the plasma concentration of another. Some of the more recently introduced anticonvulsants (vigabatrin, gabapentin) are cleared by renal excretion, and hence are not generally susceptible to this type of interaction.

Interactions which result in an enhanced clearance of an anticonvulsant - There are several examples of this in the literature. Most documented interactions relate to situations where a second anticonvulsant is added to the therapy of a patient who has been taking a single agent for some time, the second drug being an inducing agent such as phenytoin, carbamazepine or phenobarbitone. It would be expected that the second drug would result in a fall in steady-state plasma concentration of the first, as the latter’s clearance would increase over time. For example, it has been shown that patients receiving carbamazepine with phenobarbitone showed a modest reduction in their steady-state carbamazepine concentrations. This was attributed to enzyme induction by phenobarbitone.4
Some cases, however, are complex in mechanism, especially where both drugs are inducing agents but may additionally compete for the same metabolic pathways. For example, when carbamazepine is given to a patient already receiving phenytoin, the effect is unpredictable, and may result in either a rise or a fall in phenytoin concentration.5 Generally, where concentrations of phenytoin have been altered by the co-administration of carbamazepine, this has not led to loss of seizure control or to toxicity.
Other drugs which are potent inducers of oxidative enzymes (eg, rifampicin) may also enhance clearance of phenytoin, requiring dosage adjustment of the latter during co-administration.
Lamotrigine is cleared by hepatic metabolism, but by glucuronidation rather than by oxidative pathways. Interestingly, paracetamol may induce glucuronidase enzymes involved in this mechanism, and may cause a reduction in lamotrigine plasma concentrations. The clinical significance of this interaction is unclear.6

Interactions which result in a reduced clearance of an anticonvulsant - Many drugs may inhibit the metabolism of anticonvulsants. This interaction leads to an increase in steady-state serum level which, if the anticonvulsant has a narrow therapeutic index, increases the risk of toxicity. A few examples of interactions with likely clinical significance are given here.

Phenytoin - This type of interaction is a particular problem with phentoin as the drug exhibits saturable metabolism even in the absence of an enzyme inhibitor drug. If phenytoin clearance is reduced sufficiently by an inhibitor such that its elimination rate ("rate out") becomes less than the dose taken ("rate in"), accumulation and toxicity will inevitably result. Serious toxicity has occurred when phenytoin has been given with a variety of enzyme inhibitors, including cimetidine, chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole. Increases in phenytoin concentrations of less clinical significance have occurred with several drugs, including omeprazole, ceftriaxone, isoniazid and dextropropoxyphene.

Carbamazepine - As with phenytoin, a variety of drugs can inhibit this drug’s metabolism, increasing risk of accumulation. Erythromycin and, to a lesser extent, other macrolides, are well recognised to cause significant elevations of carbamazepine concentrations. Erythromycin, for example, has been reported to reduce carbamazepine clearance by 40 per cent, and to cause a three-fold increase in plasma concentration.7 Cimetidine, verapamil and several serotonin re-uptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs) have all been associated with an increase in carbamazepine concentration and concomitant toxicity when co-administered.

Lamotrigine - As stated above, lamotrigine is cleared primarily by hepatic glucuronidation. Sodium valproate competitively inhibits glucuronidase enzymes and hence increases plasma lamotrigine concentrations. As this interaction may increase the risk of lamotrigine toxicity, the initial and maintenance doses of lamotrigine should be approximately halved for a patient receiving valproate.

SITUATIONS WHERE ANTICONVULSANTS AFFECT THE ACTIONS OF OTHER DRUGS

As already stated, several anticonvulsants are either enzyme inducers or inhibitors and hence may affect the pharmacokinetics of many other drugs when co-administered. Some clinically important situations have been covered in a previous article (Interactions with warfarin, October 31, 1998, p704) and the reader is referred to this for details. This section deals with a number of significant interactions which pharmacists may encounter in clinical practice.
There are certain situations in which an anticonvulsant can cause a decreased effect of a co-administered drug. These interactions are usually due to the anticonvulsant’s effect as an inducing agent, reducing the circulating plasma concentration of the co-administered agent and hence its therapeutic effect. These interactions are generally common to phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone/primidone.

Diuretics - The efficacy of frusemide may be reduced by 50 per cent when used with phenytoin. This may be partly due to enhanced metabolism of frusemide, but also to an impairment of the transport processes of frusemide to its site of action within the renal tubules, caused by phenytoin.8

Antiarrhythmic agents - Plasma concentrations of disopyramide and quinidine may be significantly reduced by phenytoin, presumably by enzyme induction. A reduction in the effectiveness of flecainide has been reported to occur when given with carbamazepine.9

Corticosteroids - Phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone have been associated with a reduction in circulating plasma concentrations of dexamethasone. This may be clinically significant in two respects. First, patients requiring therapy with dexamethasone for the suppression of cerebral oedema are likely to need high doses (perhaps double the normal dose) for adequate response. Secondly, the use of this agent for the "dexamethasone suppression test" for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome may give misleading results in a patient receiving phenytoin. Such patients are likely to show a less than normal suppression of corticosteroid secretion after a low dose of dexamethasone, but a "normal" suppression profile after a high dose, suggesting a positive diagnosis.

Neuromuscular blocking drugs - Patients receiving vecuronium and pancuronium may show a shorter recovery time from these agents if they have been receiving therapy with phenytoin prior to surgery. This may be partly due to enhanced clearance of the drugs caused by enzyme induction; alteration in sensitivity of receptors may also contribute to this effect.10

Opioids - Phenobarbitone has been reported to reduce plasma concentrations of methadone and to precipitate withdrawal symptoms in patients stabilised on this drug.11 Phenytoin and carbamazepine have also been associated with a reduction in methadone concentrations in chronic users. Although pethidine metabolism is induced by phenobarbitone, the enhanced production of the active metabolite norpethidine may lead to an increase in sedation and toxicity.12

CONCLUSION

Anticonvulsants are a heterogeneous group of drugs, many of which have both a narrow therapeutic index and the ability to interact with a wide range of other co-administered drugs, including other anticonvulsants. Most interactions, especially with the older agents, are pharmacokinetic in mechanism, and are predictable with a knowledge of the pharmacology of the drugs.

Case study: effect of protein binding displacement of phenytoin by sodium valproate


A 25-year-old man with major tonic-clonic seizures, Mr P, is admitted for assessment of his epileptic control. He has been taking phenytoin 300mg daily as single agent therapy for several months, but has been experiencing an increase in his frequency of seizures over the past three weeks. The patient’s phenytoin plasma concentration measured on admission is 20μg/L (reference range 10-20μg/ml). It is decided to add sodium valproate 500mg tds to Mr P’s treatment, while maintaining his current dosage of phenytoin. His clinical control improves somewhat during the next few days.
After a week, a second phenytoin plasma assay reveals a level of 16μg/ml. The registrar wonders if there is scope for an increase in Mr P’s phenytoin dosage to further improve his control. What would you advise ?

COMMENT
The interaction of phenytoin with sodium valproate is complex. The initial interaction involves displacement of phenytoin from its binding sites. This process may be best understood as follows:
Phenytoin is approximately 90 per cent bound to serum albumin. Therefore, Mr P’s initial total plasma phenytoin concentration of 20μg/ml represents the sum of the protein bound drug (90 per cent of 20 = 18μg/ml) and the unbound drug (10 per cent of 20 = 2μg/ml). The unbound drug is available for distribution to the site of therapeutic effect (ie, the brain), peripheral tissues, and the site of elimination (the liver). The bound drug is confined to the bloodstream.
The addition of sodium valproate, which has higher affinity for albumin binding sites than phenytoin, may reduce phenytoin protein binding from 90 per cent to perhaps 70 per cent. Therefore, a total phenytoin concentration of 20μg/ml is now comprised of 70 per cent bound phenytoin (ie, 14μg/ml) and 30 per cent free phenytoin (ie, 6 μg/ml). This increase in free drug, if sustained, would certainly lead to phenytoin toxicity. However, the increased free drug is available to distribute to a large volume of distribution outside the circulation, and rapidly reaches a new equilibrium. This is usually at a concentration equal to, or only fractionally higher than, that which was present before the valproate was added (ie, 2μg/ml). The measured total phenytoin concentration (ie, 16μg/ml) reflects the new equilibrium of bound:unbound drug and does not imply that concentration of the active species (the unbound drug) has actually altered.

YOUR RESPONSE
Clearly it would be ideal if the unbound phenytoin concentration could be measured, and the results of pre- and post-valproate could be compared for Mr P, to confirm the above assumptions. Unfortunately, it is not routine to measure free phenytoin in most units, and deductions must be made on the basis of total plasma concentration. The registrar should be advised that it would be inappropriate to increase the dose of phenytoin, as the patient was already at the upper end of the therapeutic range prior to adding valproate to his therapy, and that the apparent change in phenytoin concentration does not indicate that his free drug concentration has fallen. An increase in dosage would increase the risk of toxicity. Although a secondary consideration, valproate is a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes and may cause a rise in phenytoin concentration over several weeks in some patients.13 This is a further reason why the dose of phenytoin should not be increased in Mr P at this time, and may in fact need to be reduced in the future.

Mr Brown is chief pharmacist, Southport and Formby NHS Trust

REFERENCES
1. Carter BL, Garnett WR, Pellock JM, et al. Effect of antacids on phenytoin bioavailability. Ther Drug Monitor 1981;3:330-40.
2. Syverson GB, Morgan JP, Weintraub M, et al. Acetazolamide-induced interference with primidone absorption. Arch Neurol 1977;34:80.
3. Summers VM, Grant R. Nasogastric feeding and phenytoin interaction. Pharm J 1989;243:181.
4. Cereghino JJ, Brock JT, van Meter JC, et al. The efficacy of carbamazepine combinations in epilepsy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975:18: 733-41.
5. Lai ML, Lin TS, Huang JD. Effect of single and multiple dose carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of diphenylhydantoin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992;43:201-3.
6. Depot M. Powell JR, Messenheimer JA, et al. Kinetics effects of multiple oral doses of acetaminophen on a single dose of lamotrigine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990;48:346-55.
7. Wong YY, Ludden TM, Bell RD, et al. Effect of erythromycin on carbamazepine kinetics. Ibid 1983;33:460-4.


Ahmad S. Reduced sensitivity to frusemide caused by chronic anticonvulsant therapy. BMJ 1974;3:657.
9. Spina E. Pisani F, Perruca E. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with carbamazepine. An update. Pharmacokinetics 1996;31:198-214.
10. Chen J, Kim YD, Dubois M, et al. The increased requirement of pancuronium in neurosurgical patients receiving phenytoin chronically. Anaesthesiology 1983;59:A288.
11. Lui SJ, Wang RIH. Case report of barbiturate-induced enhancement of methadone metabolism and withdrawal syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1984:141:1287-8.
12. Staumbaugh JE, Wainer IW, Hemphill DM, et al. A potentially toxic drug interaction between pethidine (meperidine) and phenobarbitone. Lancet 1977;1:398-9.
13. Houghton GW, Richens A. Inhibition of phenytoin metabolism by other drugs used in epilepsy. Int J Clin Pharmacol, Therapy Toxicol 1975;12: 210.