The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 263 No 7072
p820-825
November 20, 1999 Special Feature
Wound care
Wound management products in the Drug Tariff
By D. A. Morgan, MRPharmS, MCPP
In the past few years, many new wound management products have been added to the Drug Tariff. This review outlines the different types of product available, discussing their advantages and disadvantages and their characteristics with reference to "ideal" dressings
|
Sloughy pressure ulcer wound (Convatec)
|
In the early 1980s, very few dressings were available, apart from traditional dressings and paste bandages. The first representatives of modern wound management products were used in hospitals during the mid 1980s. These did not become available in primary care until 1988 when Inadine, Granuflex, Kaltostat and Sorbsan were added to the Drug Tariff. Up until 1995, further products were cautiously added following careful evaluation. Many primary care practitioners, eg, nurses, and wound care groups complained about the limited choice in the Drug Tariff.
From 1996, however, this considered approach appears to have been abandoned as an avalanche of new products have been added both to the Drug Tariff and to the list of preparations which can be prescribed by nurses, namely Part XVIIB of the Drug Tariff (see Table 1).1 There is limited information available about these products, eg, of evidence of effectiveness of individual products or of comparative effectiveness. In fact, when added to the Drug Tariff, it is often difficult to find out basic details such as the name of the manufacturer of the product.
|
Table 1: Additions to Drug Tariff |
| Year |
Number of products added to Drug Tariff |
| 1988 |
4 |
| 1989 |
1 |
| 1990 |
4 |
| 1991 |
4 |
| 1992 |
2 |
| 1993 |
5 |
| 1994 |
4 |
| 1995 |
5 |
| 1996 |
12 |
| 1997 |
15 |
| 1998 |
26 |
| 1999 |
55 (until November) |
|
|
This review covers wound management products in the Drug Tariff (and some additional comments about miscellaneous products used in the community, such as antibiotics and antiseptics). Typical products in each group are considered with reference to their ideal characteristics (see Panel, right), advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness and use. Precise details of sizes, shapes and price of products can be found in the Approved List of Appliances in Part IXA of the Drug Tariff.1 General information about individual products is available in the British National Formulary,2 in the Formulary of Wound Management Products3 and from the Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory website.4
|
Characteristics of ideal dressing
- Maintains moist environment at the wound dressing interface
- Provides thermal insulation
- Low or non-adherent
- Requires infrequent changing
- Provides mechanical protection
- Free from particulate contaminants
- Safe to use (non-toxic, non-sensitising, non-allergenic)
- Conformable and mouldable
- Good absorption characteristics (for exuding wounds)
- Impermeable to micro-organisms
- Acceptable to the patient
- Cost effective
- Sterile
- Available in a suitable range of forms/sizes
|
Traditional dressings
Conventional dry dressings such as cotton wool, gauze, and lint fail to meet many of the characteristics of an "ideal" dressing, ie, they shed fibres into the wound, adhere to the wound base and dehydrate the wound. They also allow strike through. Such dressings should only be used on clean, dry wounds or as secondary dressings for their absorbent and protective functions.
Low adherent dressings
|
Low-adherent dressings (Table 2) are the modern alternative to traditional dressings. Most dressings in this group are low-adherent rather than non-adherent, although N-A Ultra is claimed to be truly non-adherent. Most are suitable for use on dry wounds or on lightly exuding wounds. Mepitel, Mesorb and Mepore can be used on medium to heavy exuding wounds, although a secondary dressing may be required to absorb excess exudate.
|
Table 2: Low adherent dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Melolin |
Smith & Nephew |
| Mepitel |
Mölnlycke |
| Mepore |
Mölnlycke |
| Mesorb |
Mölnlycke |
| N-A |
Johnson & Johnson |
| N-A Ultra |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Primapore |
Smith & Nephew |
| Release |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Setoprime |
Seton |
| Skintact |
Robinson |
| Tricotex |
Smith & Nephew |
|
Vapour-permeable adhesive films
Vapour-permeable adhesive films (formerly known as semi-permeable films) are sterile, thin, films (Table 3). Most of them are coated with hypoallergenic adhesive. They are the most flexible of the products as they can mould around elbows, heels and sacral areas. They differ in terms of vapour permeability, adhesiveness, conformability and extensibility. Films are variably transparent, depending on the product. They tend to cool the wound surface, which may not be desirable.
Excessive exudate may accumulate as a bubble under the film. In these circumstances, the film should be removed, the wound irrigated with normal saline and a new film applied.
Films are only considered suitable for relatively shallow wounds. Opsite Flexigrid (formerly Opsite) incorporates a grid system on the upper layer of the film which can be used for mapping wound size and producing a permanent record. Films are also used prophylactically to prevent pressure ulcers, as retention dressings, eg, for cannulas and for operative surgery as sterile drapes.
|
Table 3: Vapour-permeable adhesive films |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Bioclusive |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Cutifilm |
Beiersdorf |
| Epiview |
Convatec |
| Mefilm |
Mölnlycke |
| Opsite Flexigrid |
Smith & Nephew |
| Tegaderm |
3M Health Care |
|
Hydrogels
Hydrogel dressings (Table 4) contain a large proportion of water - often more than 70-90 per cent. Nu-Gel and Purilon are hydrogel/alginate combinations.
Hydrogels have many of the characteristics of an "ideal" dressing, eg, they promote moist healing, and are non-adherent. They can cool the surface of the wound and this is said to be the cause of the marked reduction in pain that is reported in patients using these dressings. Sometimes hydrogels are refrigerated to increase this effect.
Hydrogels are suitable for use on dry "sloughy" or necrotic wounds and for lightly exuding wounds. They are suitable for use for all stages of wound healing except for infected or heavily-exuding wounds. Most hydrogels require covering with a secondary dressing.
A recent innovation has been an extension to the range of gel formulations available - there are now six gels. They are an excellent alternative to chlorinated solutions such as Eusol for desloughing wounds. Intrasite gel sachet has been replaced by a user-friendly "applipak" dispenser in two sizes.
|
Table 4: Hydrogels |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Aquaform |
Robert Bailey |
| Granugel |
Convatec |
| Intrasite gel |
Smith & Nephew |
| Nu-Gel |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Purilon gel |
Coloplast |
| Sterigel |
Seton |
|
Applying Nu-Gel, one of the combination hydrogel/alginate products (Johnson & Johnson)
|
Hydrocolloids
|
Hydrocolloid dressings (Table 5) are more complicated than hydrogels. They contain a variety of constituents such as methylcellulose, pectin, gelatin and polyisobutylene. Comfeel Plus is a hydrocolloid/alginate combination dressing. When in contact with wound exudate, hydrocolloids slowly absorb fluid, leading to a change in the physical state of the dressing and the formation of a gel covering the wound. Thus they are called "interactive" dressings. Hydrocolloids promote the formation of granulation tissue and provide pain relief by covering nerve endings with gel and exudate.
The selection of dressing is becoming more technical as semi-permeable, thin semi-permeable and fibrous forms of hydrocolloids are marketed, with or without adhesive borders. Depending on the choice of product, hydrocolloids are suitable for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds, for desloughing, and for light to medium or medium to heavy exuding wounds. They are not suitable for infected wounds.
Initially, dressings may need to be changed daily but, once the exudate has diminished, dressings may be left in place for up to seven days. Except for Aquacel (which is not waterproof), the dressings are waterproof and require no secondary dressings, and thus patients can bathe or shower.
|
Table 5: hydrocolloids |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Aquacel |
Convatec |
| Askina Biofilm Transparent |
Braun |
| Combiderm |
Convatec |
| Comfeel |
Coloplast |
| Comfeel Plus |
Coloplast |
| Comfeel Plus Contour |
Coloplast |
| Cutinova foam |
Beiersdorf |
| Cutinova cavity |
Beiersdorf |
| Duoderm Extra Thin |
Convatec |
| Granuflex |
Convatec |
| Granuflex bordered |
Convatec |
| Hydrocoll basic |
Paul Hartman |
| Hydrocoll border |
Paul Hartman |
| Hydrocoll thin film |
Paul Hartman |
| Replicare Ultra |
Smith & Nephew |
| Tegasorb |
3M Health Care |
|
Aquacel, a hydrocolloid dressing. This type of dressing changes physical state as it absorbs fluid from wound exudate
(Convatec)
|
Polysaccharide dressings
Polysaccharide dressings are listed in Table 6. Debrisan products are suitable for sloughy, exuding wound cavities. Debrisan consists of sterile, spherical beads of dextranomer which are not biodegradable. Rinsing away the soiled beads can be difficult and the advised method of application of the paste is cumbersome.
Iodosorb consists of hydrophilic beads of cadexomer impregnated with elemental iodine and is suitable for infected, exuding cavities. Cadexomer is a modified starch hydrogel which is biodegradable. Dressings should be changed frequently when saturated with exudate, indicated by a loss of colour of the iodine. The powder should be changed daily and the ointment three times per week. Iodoflex consists of sterile cadexomer iodine paste sandwiched in protective gauze and is changed two to three times per week or when there is a loss of colour.
Generally, ointments and pastes are more convenient to use than powders, beads or granules which can be difficult to contain within certain types of wounds.
|
Table 6: Polysaccharide dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Debrisan beads |
Pharmacia & Upjohn |
| Debrisan paste |
Pharmacia & Upjohn |
| (Debrisan absorbent pads |
discontinued) |
| Iodosorb powder |
Smith & Nephew |
| Iodosorb ointment |
Smith & Nephew |
| Iodoflex |
Smith & Nephew |
|
Alginate dressings
Algisite M, Algosteril and Melgisorb are the most recent additions to this group (Table 7). Kaltogel is a quick gelling, calcium/sodium alginate with reduced lateral wicking. Seasorb was formerly called Comfeel:Seasorb and Tegagen was formerly called Tegagel.
A recent improvement in the Drug Tariff is the addition of alginate cavity dressings such as packing (Melgisorb, Sorbsan), rope (Algisite M, Algosteril, Kaltostat), ribbon (Sorbsan) and filler (Seasorb).
Alginate dressings are manufactured from different varieties of seaweed (used for many generations by sailors as dressings for wounds). Alginic acid consists of a polymer containing mannuronic and guluronic residues. Alginates rich in mannuronic acid (like Sorbsan) form soft, flexible gels, whereas those which are rich in guluronic acid (like Kaltostat) form firmer gels. Some dressings contain calcium alginate fibre (Sorbsan and Tegagen) and others contain sodium-calcium alginate fibre (Seasorb, Kaltogel and Kaltostat).
Alginates5,6 are suitable for use on medium to heavy exuding wounds and cavities. They are not the dressings of choice for infected wounds and should not be applied to dry or drying wounds, eg, necrotic tissue. Most alginates (except Sorbsan Plus) require a secondary dressing.
|
Table 7: Alginate dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Algisite M |
Smith & Nephew |
| Algosteril |
Les Laboratoires Brothier |
| Kaltogel |
Convatec |
| Kaltostat |
Convatec |
| Melgisorb |
Mölnlycke |
| Seasorb |
Coloplast |
| Sorbsan |
Maersk |
| Sorbsan Plus |
Maersk |
| Tegagen |
3M Health Care |
|
Melgisorb cavity dressing— one of the newer alginate dressings (Mölnlycke)
|
Foams
Many new foams have recently been added to the Drug Tariff (Table 8). These products consist of polyurethane foam or polyurethane foam film, with or without adhesive borders. Most foams are suitable for use on light to medium exuding wounds, except Tielle Lite which is for lightly to non-exuding wounds. Many foams can be left in place for about seven days, depending on exudate volume. Foams are not recommended for dry, superficial wounds. Besides the usual range of sizes, anatomically shaped dressings are available for the sacrum (Allevyn, Lyofoam Extra, Tielle) and heel (Allevyn).
Allevyn cavity wound dressing is designed to overcome the problems associated with dressing deep wounds. It is available in two circular and two tubular shapes. The dressing can remain in place for up to five days and can be used in conjunction with a gel or paste to ensure that all contours of the wound are kept moist. Lyofoam can be used as a non-traumatic method of reducing hypergranulation tissue.7
|
Table 8: Foams |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Allevyn |
Smith & Nephew |
| Allevyn Adhesive |
Smith & Nephew |
| Allevyn Cavity |
Smith & Nephew |
| Askina Transorbent |
Braun |
| Biatain Adhesive |
Coloplast |
| Flexipore |
Polymedica |
| Lyofoam |
Seton |
| Lyofoam Extra |
Seton |
| Spyrosorb |
Smith & Nephew |
| Tielle |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Tielle Lite |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Tielle Sacrum |
Johnson & Johnson |
|
Lyofoam Extra - a foam dressing. This type of product is generally suitable for use on light to medium exuding wounds
(Seton) |
Odour absorbing dressings (deodorisers)
|
Odour absorbing dressings (Table 9) are suitable for discharging, purulent and contaminated wounds complicated by bacterial infection and offensive odour. Most of the traditional deodorisers contain activated charcoal which reduces the concentration of offensive odour to low levels. The only activated charcoal product available in the Drug Tariff is Actisorb Plus. It also contains silver, which inhibits bacterial growth in the dressing.
Metrotop gel is a clear, colourless gel containing metronidazole 0.8 per cent w/v in an aqueous hypromellose base. Anabact contains metronidazole 0.75 per cent. They are licensed for the treatment of malodorous fungating tumours, gravitational ulcers and pressure sores, as they are active against anaerobic bacteria associated with the pungent smell. They are used once or twice daily as necessary. There is a possibility that the use of metronidazole topically may induce antibiotic resistance. Thus, in my view, topical use should be restricted to fungating, malodorous tumours until more experience is gained of their use. The switch from oral to topical metronidazole in the treatment of malodorous wounds seems to have occurred on the basis of few reliable data.8 Metronidazole gel has not been compared with tablets for efficacy, speed of action or patient preference.9
Note: Metrogel (Sandoz) and Rozex (Stafford-Miller) are licensed for treating acute inflammatory exacerbation of acne rosacea and not for deodorising wounds.
Sugar pastes are also very effective in deodorising wounds and are used in the community. The pastes are made from caster sugar, icing sugar (additive free), polyethylene glycol and hydrogen peroxide.10 Thin sugar paste can be instilled into wounds with small openings, using a syringe and quill. Thick sugar paste can be packed into wounds with large openings. Twice daily (or more frequent) packing of wounds is necessary. Sugar may exert its antibacterial effect by competing for the water present in the cells of bacteria.
|
Table 9: Odour absorbing dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Actisorb Plus |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Anabact |
Bioglan Laboratories |
| Metrotop gel |
Seton |
| Sugar paste |
– |
|
Paste bandages
Paste bandages (Table 10) are suitable for treating skin conditions, such as eczema and inflammation, associated with leg ulcers. They act as a buffer between fragile, inflamed skin and compression bandages and are able to absorb exudate and deslough wounds. However, many patients are sensitive to some of the constituents of paste bandages, such as parabens preservatives, so it is advisable to patch test the patient with a small strip of bandage over at least 48 hours. If used sensibly, these bandages still have a valuable part to play in skin and wound care.
Zinc paste bandages (Steripaste, Viscopaste PB7 and Zincaband) are protective, soothing applications for reddened, irritated skin. Steripaste has a preservative-free formulation. Zipzoc is rayon stocking impregnated with preservative free zinc ointment, which is not available in the community.
Ichthammol bandages (Ichthopaste, Icthaband) can be used to soothe irritated skin when tar is not tolerated. Coal tar bandages (Coltapaste, Tarband) are useful for their anti-inflammatory and mild antiseptic properties. Calaband (containing calamine) is emollient and soothes irritated fragile skin, while Quinaband contains both calamine and clioquinol and acts as an antibacterial and deodorant.
These traditional bandages have the advantage that they can be left in situ for one to two weeks before a dressing change is required. When used on legs, paste bandages are applied loosely from the base of the toes to below the knee or applied in short strips. They are not compression bandages but are usually applied between a wound contact dressing and a compression bandage (for venous ulceration).
|
Table 10: Paste bandages |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Calaband |
Seton |
| Coltapaste |
Smith & Nephew |
| Ichthopaste |
Smith & Nephew |
| Icthaband |
Seton |
| Quinaband |
Seton |
| Steripaste |
Seton |
| Tarband |
Seton |
| Viscopaste PB7 |
Smith & Nephew |
| Zincaband |
Seton |
|
Tulle (non-medicated) dressings
Non-medicated tulle (Table 11) can be used for clean, superficial wounds, such as dermabrasion or partial thickness burns. Tulles contain different weights of paraffin per unit area and can be described as either light loaded (90-130g/m2 ,eg, Paranet) or normal loaded (175-220g/m2, eg, Jelonet). Paraffin reduces the adherence of the dressing to the wound. The dressings require frequent changes in order to avoid drying out and incorporation into granulation tissue. Secondary dressings are always required.
|
Table 11: Tulle (non-medicated) dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Jelonet |
Smith & Nephew |
| Paranet |
Vernon Carus |
| Paratulle |
Seton |
| Unitulle |
Roussel |
|
Tulle (medicated) dressings
The medicated tulle dressings (Table 12) are often used inappropriately for infected, superficial wounds. Bactigras, Clorhexitulle and Serotulle are all similar, containing 0.5 per cent chlorhexidine. These dressings are suitable if the use of an antiseptic product is deemed necessary. The use of Fucidin Intertulle and Sofra-Tulle is declining in wound care as both products contain topical antibiotics (see below) and lanolin which carries the risk of skin sensitisation.
|
Table 12: Tulle (medicated) dressings |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Bactigras |
Smith & Nephew |
| Clorhexitulle |
Roussel |
| Serotulle |
Seton |
| Fucidin Intertulle |
Leo |
| Sofra-Tulle |
Roussel |
|
Other topical antibiotics
|
As a general rule, antibiotics (Table 13) should not be applied topically to wounds but should be given systemically. Plasmid transfer and induction of antibiotic resistance can be eliminated by restricting the use of topical antibiotics. Sensitivity reactions can cause considerable harm and delay healing. The precise place of Bactroban in wound management remains to be established.
|
Table 13: Other topical antibiotics |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Bactroban |
Smithkline Beecham |
| Cicatrin |
Glaxo Wellcome |
| Fucidin |
Leo |
| Graneodin |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
|
Antibacterials
Antibacterial products are listed in Table 14. Flamazine is a hydrophilic cream containing silver sulphadiazine 1 per cent which is very effective against pseudomonas. It has been used since 1968 for burns and is also used for other infected wounds where infection may prevent healing. It is mainly used under absorbent dressings, which are changed at least three times a week for leg ulcers. There is a possibility of leucopenia. Sensitivity reactions, caused by one of the excipients in the cream can occur but are uncommon. The two metronidazole products have already been described (see above).
|
Table 14: Antibacterials |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Anabact |
Bioglan Laboratories |
| Flamazine |
Smith & Nephew |
| Metrotop gel |
Seton |
|
Antiseptics
Traditional antiseptics such as cetrimide may have toxic effects on healing tissues and may delay the healing process. Thus, antiseptics should not generally be used to cleanse or irrigate wounds.11 However, for topical use, antiseptics used judiciously and sparingly are preferable to antibiotics.
Products containing cetrimide, eg, Savlon, Steriwipes and Tisept, are toxic to fibroblasts, even at low concentrations. Thus, these products are not recommended for regular use for cleansing wounds. Water in oil emulsions of proflavine cream have little or no antiseptic activity, as the proflavine is not released from the emulsion base and is therefore ineffective. The cream also contains wool fat and hypersensitivity reactions have been reported.
The ideal antiseptic is non-toxic, non-sensitising and contains no alcohol. Alcohol fixes skin cells and delays healing.
|
Cetrimide, dyes and chlorinated solutions should be avoided. Antiseptics (Table 15) containing chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine, eg, Inadine, are probably the most useful, if an antiseptic is required. Inadine, Iodosorb products and Iodoflex can also be considered for infected, exuding wounds. Many antiseptics are deactivated by organic material, eg, slough. The antiseptic should have appropriate activity against a range of micro-organisms. It should ideally be stable, have a long shelf-life and be inexpensive. Sodium chloride (saline) solutions are probably just as effective as antiseptics and several products have recently become available (see miscellaneous section).
|
Table 15: Antiseptics |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Chlorhexidine |
Many manufacturers |
| Inadine |
Johnson & Johnson |
| Povidone-iodine |
Many manufacturers |
|
Desloughers
Desloughing agents are listed in Table 16. A wound will not heal until the slough is removed but the use of many desloughing agents is controversial. Hydrogen peroxide and Aserbine have not been evaluated. Chlorinated solutions are still available and are used as Chlorasol, Dakin's, Eusol and Milton. They have been used as desloughing agents for over 100 years but recently their use has been questioned because of various adverse effects such as delayed healing, cell toxicity, irritancy and reduced capillary blood flow.12,13
Modern practitioners prefer to use alternative products such as hydrogels, sugar paste, hydrocolloids, alginates or Debrisan products. These may not be as effective as traditional solutions in removing the slough but they are non-toxic and do not delay wound healing. There is also renewed interest in an old treatment - maggots or Larv E (see below).
Necrotic wounds are usually covered with black eschar or scabs, eg, a black heel and will not heal until the necrotic tissue is removed. Surgical debridement is a fast and efficient way of removing the necrosis and hydrocolloids are also effective because of their occlusive, rehydrating properties. Varidase removes the necrosis effectively. On debridement, a larger sloughy wound remains.
|
Table 16: Desloughers |
| Product |
Manufacturer |
| Aserbine |
Goldshield |
| Chlorinated solutions |
Various |
| Hioxyl |
Quinoderm |
| Hydrogen peroxide |
Various |
| Larv E |
SMTL (Bridgend) |
| Varidase |
Wyeth |
|
Multi-layer compression bandaging
|
For many years, these products were not available for use in primary care. During the past 12 months, however, many products have been added to the Drug Tariff that can be used as components in a multi-layer bandaging system for use in the treatment of venous ulceration. Multi-layer bandaging "kits" are not prescribable as such. However, if prescribers wish to prescribe the individual components they are free to do so, and pharmacists are free to meet a prescription with a "kit", eg, Profore, System 4, Ultra Four, if the content of the kit exactly matches the components prescribed.
Typically, components of a multi-layer bandaging system are applied over a wound contact layer (primary dressing) and are as follows:
- First layer - natural orthopaedic wool layer which is used to absorb exudate and redistribute pressure around the ankle. Applied in a loose spiral, eg, Soffban, Softexe and Sohfast
- Second layer - a crepe bandage which increases absorbency and smoothes the orthopaedic wool layer. Applied in a spiral, eg, K-Lite, Setocrepe and Soff- crepe
- Third layer - a light compression bandage, eg, Elset, K-Plus and Litepress
- Fourth layer - an elastic, cohesive bandage which maintains the four layers in place, eg, Coban, Cohfast and Co-plus.
|
Multilayer compression bandaging (Ultra Four), used to treat venous ulceration (Robinson Healthcare Ltd)
|
Note: There are specific systems designed for ankle circumferences less than 18cm, 18-25cm, 25-30cm and greater than 30cm. The four-layer systems can be left in place for up to a week.
Multi-layer bandaging systems are a suitable option for patients with venous ulcers but all patients require a thorough assessment. They are widely used but there is no information available from randomised, controlled trials comparing two-layer, three-layer and four-layer systems. However, the routine application of layered compression therapy can improve healing rates for venous leg ulcers.
Readers who are interested in more information are referred to an Effective Health Care Bulletin14 which has summarised the results of research on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different forms of compression in the treatment of venous ulceration, on interventions to prevent recurrence, and on methods of diagnosing venous ulceration.
Miscellaneous products
The most useful solutions are normal saline eg, Askina Jet Saline, Askina Spray, Irriclens, Normasol, Sterijet Saline and Steripod Saline. They are used to cleanse and irrigate wounds as alternatives to topical antiseptics and antibiotics.
Future developments
In the near future, there will be adjustments to the present range of products in the Drug Tariff. A larger range of sizes and different shapes will become available, eg, shaped sacral and heel products, and oval shapes. Many products will be available with and without borders, bevelled edges and adhesive. There will be extensions to the present range of products, eg, odour absorbing dressings, and some existing products may be deleted for wound care, eg, antiseptic and antibacterial products. Some new dressings may be added eg, collagens, membranes and tissue adhesives. Regranex gel is the first growth factor to be licensed for the treatment of diabetic ulcers.
There will be an increased interest in biosurgical research,15 eg, leeches and maggots. Infestation by maggots (or larvae) of the order Diptera is termed myiasis.16 Invasion of tissues by maggots is commonly seen in tropical countries and, if left in the wound, maggots are effective in debriding the wound. They are traditionally removed from infested wounds by using ether, chloroform, hydrogen peroxide or even raw steak. The biosurgical research unit at Bridgend and District NHS trust is producing sterile larvae of the common greenbottle (Lucilia sericata) for wound care research and treatment of infected wounds.17
These maggots are marketed as Larv E and have been granted the Millennium Product Marque (which means that they may be exhibited at the Millennium Exhibition and at other centres in the UK and, through the British Council, abroad). Maggots are being used in over 300 sites, including general practitioner surgeries, where they are being assessed for their effectiveness by the International Biotherapy Society. When will they be added to the Drug Tariff?
|
Maggots are being use to treat infected wounds (Biosurgical Research Unit, Bridgend)
|
Finally, more research and evaluation is needed. After a thorough assessment of the patient and wound type, the best existing advice is to select the cheapest product which has the most ideal characteristics. At present, it is impossible to select the "best" hydrocolloid, alginate, hydrogel, etc, or to state that a particular dressing in one group is better than one in another for a particular wound type. Thus, there is a need for evidence-based information to aid selection of the most appropriate wound management product. This is particularly important for nurse prescribers18 as most wound management products are in the nurses' formulary.
Mr Morgan is director of pharmaceutical public health, North Wales Health Authority, Hendy Road, Mold, Flintshire CH7 1PZ
References
| 1. Department of Health and National Assembly for Wales. Drug Tariff. London: Stationery Office, October 1999. |
| 2. British National Formulary. London: British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. September 1999. |
| 3. Morgan DA. Formulary of wound management products, 7th ed (revised). October 1997. Available from Euromed Communications, Old Surgery, Liphook Road, Haslemere, Surrey DU 27 1NL (£4.50). |
| 4. Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory website: http://www.smtl.co.uk/ |
| 5. Morgan DA. Alginate dressings. Part 1: Historical aspects. J Tissue Viabil 1997;7:4-9. |
| 6. Morgan DA. Alginate dressings. Part 2: Product guide. Ibid 1997;7:9-14. |
| 7. Harris A, Rolstad BS. Hypergranulation tissue: a non-traumatic method of management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Advances in Wound Management, Harding KG, Cherry G, Dealey C, Turner TD, editors. London, Macmillan Magazines Ltd, 1993:35-7. |
| 8. Hampson JP. The use of metronidazole in the treatment of malodorous wounds. J Wound Care 1996;5:421-6. [Medline reference] |
| 9. Metronidazole gel for smelly tumours. Drug Ther Bull 1992;30:18-19. [Medline reference] |
| 10. Middleton KR, Seal D. Sugar as an aid to wound healing. Pharm J 1985;235:757-8. |
| 11. Morgan DA. Is there still a role for antiseptics? J Tissue Viabil 1993;3:80-4. |
| 12. Morgan DA. Chlorinated solutions - E(useful) or (e)useless. Pharm J 1989;243:219-20. |
| 13. Moore D. Hypochlorites: a review of the evidence. J Wound Care 1992;1:44-53. |
| 14. Compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. Effective Health Care Bulletin 1997;3(4):1-12. |
| 15. Biosurgical Research website: http://www.smtl.co.uk/WMPRC/BioSurgery/index.html |
| 16. Morgan DA. Myiasis: The rise and fall of maggot therapy. J Tissue Viabil 1995;5:43-51. |
| 17. Thomas S, Jones M, Shutler S, Jones S. Using larvae in modern wound management. J Wound Care 1996;5:60-9. |
| 18. National Prescribing Centre, Liverpool. Modern wound management dressings. Prescribing Nurse Bulletin 1999:1; 5-8. [Medline reference] |