See also:
Call for reconsideration of Council election canvassing
Conference success?
No support for electoral college for Society's presidential elections
Representatives want UCAS style scheme for preregistration placements
Branches want their role reviewed
Pros and cons of STV discussed
Representatives want Society's public relations assessed for performance
Representatives want earlier Council response to BRM motions
Branch representatives support emergency hormonal contraception from pharmacies
A motion from the British Pharmaceutical Students Association, calling for the Society to provide a permanent office for the association at its Lambeth headquarters, received the support of the meeting.
|
Jonathan Burton: need for BPSA to be more available |
The motion was formally seconded by Ms ELIZABETH DORAN (BPSA). She said it would provide the BPSA with a centralised resource and a permanent address, which would make it easier for sponsors to contact it. It would give the BPSA a good base for commercial and professional meetings.
The PRESIDENT asked for clarification as to the resources required, whether it was just a room or whether it included support services.
Mr BURTON said there was a distinct difference between a permanent office and a permanent officer. This was a first step to give the association a chance to examine the possibilities for a permanent officer to work in the building.
Mr ROBERT DUNKLEY (Leeds) spoke against the motion, asking who would give up a year of their education to man such an office. There were better ways round the problem then to establish a permanent office in the Society's headquarters. Use should be made of current technology to put the BPSA on line.
The PRESIDENT pointed out that the executive of the BPSA had given the matter careful consideration.
The motion was carried.