From Mr P. Paul, MCIJ
SIR,-No professional communicator could fail to be interested by The Pharmaceutical Journal's report of the Council's debate on the replacement of its about-to-depart editor (PJ, August 12, p229).
Having been responsible for the public relations representation of two state industries (the Central Electricity Generating Board and the Post Office) and after 14 years of similar functions for two professional bodies (six as director of PR to the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and eight as director of PR to the [pre-Royal] Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain), may I offer a few thoughts that might be helpful to the decision-makers in this matter?
The classic example of editorial independence that stands out in my mind arises from my time as a reporter on the Daily Express. The paper was owned by Lord Beaverbrook (whose clear managerial thinking had been amply proven by his success as Minister for Aircraft Production during the 1939-45 war) but he allowed the editor, Arthur Christiansen, unimpeded freedom of editorial judgment. He even permitted the paper's "star" cartoonist, Low, to depict him as a grotesque dwarf - proof that wise proprietorship does not always demand flattery.
Philip Paul
Chairman, Health and Medical Public Relations Association