The Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Practice Committee has produced a guidance document on the process of counter prescribing, with the objective of ensuring consistency and quality of advice in community pharmacies. A downloadable PDF version of the document is to be made available on the Society's website
The advent of clinical governance and an increasing emphasis on teamworking in health care have heralded the Government's commitment to supporting consistency and quality of advice throughout the NHS. Two of the key issues that the Government has sought to address in its policies on the NHS are improving access to services and reducing variability.
These developments have been evident in the general move within the NHS towards clinical decision support systems. NHS Direct uses computer-based clinical decision support systems to ensure that callers receive consistent advice. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence has been set up to issue clinical guidelines to prescribers to ensure patients receive maximum benefit from their medicines while being cost-effective, while computer systems such as Prodigy are increasingly used in a general medical practice setting to help ensure that the most appropriate treatment is given.
This practice guidance on counter prescribing for self-limiting minor illness and common conditions has been produced by the Society against this current background. It provides a framework for the provision of advice on the treatment of symptoms rather than responding to requests for medicines by name. It is intended to offer pharmacists an aid to reflective practice, audit and training and to enable a wider audience to understand the generic process of counter prescribing, while offering advice on good practice.
There is considerable confusion over the use of terms such as algorithms, guidelines, protocols and clinical decision support systems. Systems which would support quality and consistency while allowing the user to bring in their own knowledge and experience seem most likely to be relevant to pharmacists. An appropriate system could also aid data collection and audit. It is hoped that this guidance will form part of a phased approach to examine ways in which the provision of high quality, consistent advice could be supported, both in pharmacy settings and elsewhere within the NHS.
This guidance is applicable to requests for advice on the treatment of symptoms rather than to requests for medicines by name. It is intended to:
Pharmacists are reminded that, under the terms of the Code of Ethics, they have a professional responsibility to exercise control over all medicinal and related products which are purchased or supplied (Principle One, Obligation 1.2). They must, on each occasion that a pharmaceutical service is provided, use their professional judgment to decide whether they need to see the patient or carer in person (Principle One, Obligation 1.22).
This guidance supplements the standards for the sale of non-prescribed medicines and for relationships with patients and the public set out within the Society's ‘Medicines, Ethics and Practice' guide.
General principles
(a) Recognising and interpreting the condition To make an assessment of the presenting symptoms, the following should always be explored with the patient or customer.
The possibility of serious disease should always be excluded. The following should always be referred:
Particular care should be exercised when dealing with babies, infants and children, pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers and older people.
(b) Determining the goal of treatment (therapeutic objective) The objective of the treatment recommended should be one of the following:
(c) Recommending a treatment Three basic categories of action should be considered, taking account of the patient's own health beliefs and preferences:
Assess the risks of the proposed course of action. Remember that in many instances a medicine may not be necessary and indeed may be contraindicated.
(d) Provision of advice The following information should be provided where appropriate:
Information provided must be appropriate and provided in a way that the patient can understand.
(e) Quality assurance and audit In order to allow monitoring of the treatment that has been recommended and allow audit of interventions, a record of the intervention should be made in appropriate cases on a patient medication record system.