|
Introduction Differing health care systems, linguistic difficulties and the use of a number of terms interchangeably have all contributed to difficulties in describing pharmaceutical care in different countries.1 A range of activities has been described as contributing to pharmaceutical care, but again there is a lack of consistency. In Scotland, a Clinical Resource and Audit Group document, "Clinical pharmacy practice in primary care",2 which defines pharmaceutical care as "the pharmaceutical contribution to patient care", has as its principle objective "to improve pharmaceutical care through the development of a structured, systematic approach to clinical pharmacy practice".
Method Potential factors of importance identified from the literature were incorporated into an interview checklist. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were held with 16 individuals who represented pharmaceutical organisations within Scotland or provided pharmaceutical care. Interviews were held with the following: national specialists in clinical pharmacy and in pharmaceutical care; one primary care NHS trust chief pharmacist; one employee community pharmacist; one contractor pharmacist; one full-time practice pharmacist; and representatives from each of: Scottish Centre for Post Qualification Pharmaceutical Education, Scottish Specialists in Pharmaceutical Public Health, Scottish Pharmaceutical Prescribing Advisers Group, National Pharmaceutical Association, Scottish Executive of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (two), Strathclyde University school of pharmacy, Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council, Boots, Lloyds.
|
Focal points
|
Results All 16 pharmacists interviewed agreed with the guideline approach to the pharmaceutical care of individual patients and, while the importance of a multi-disciplinary and all-embracing approach was stressed by many, almost all clearly identified the community pharmacy as a key locus for delivering pharmaceutical care. Many reasons for this were given, such as knowledge of the local patient population, accessibility, availability, informality and the size of the community pharmacy workforce. Workforce issues were also mentioned by ten as a barrier to implementing pharmaceutical care, because of the need to increase pharmacists' available time. Other factors frequently identified were the need for updating of clinical knowledge and the skills to implement these (10), space within the pharmacy (9), access to patient information (9) and the remuneration structure (9). Relationships with GPs, computer systems/IT, legislative issues, and the attitudes of pharmacists and patients were mentioned by less than half those interviewed.
Three factors were identified most frequently as of greater importance in enabling the development of pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies. These were the inappropriate nature of the current remuneration structure for pharmaceutical care practice, pharmacists' clinical knowledge/ skills and relationships with GPs enabling access to clinical information. Existing relationships with GPs were considered to be generally good. Several stated that there were no insurmountable barriers and that attitudes among community pharmacists, although not always supportive, could be changed if the remuneration increasingly rewarded pharmaceutical care activities.
Discussion This study found consensus among representatives of major pharmaceutical organisations that, although barriers5 still exist, community pharmacists should be involved in delivering pharmaceutical care using a systematic approach.2 To facilitate its development, pharmaceutical organisations must ensure pharmacists are adequately trained to provide pharmaceutical care services and consider changes to their remuneration to encourage changes in practice, which will capitalise on and extend existing good relationships with GPs.
College of Pharmacy Practice, University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry
| 1. van Mil JWF, McElnay J, de Jong-van den Berg W, Tromp TFJ. The challenges of defining pharmaceutical care on an international level. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:202-8. |
| 2. Clinical Resource and Audit Group. Clinical pharmacy practice in primary care. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Department of Health; 1999. |
| 3. Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. New York: Pharmaceutical care practice, McGraw-Hill; 1998. |
| 4. Krska J, Cromarty J, Arris F, Jamieson D, Hansford D. Providing pharmaceutical care using a systematic approach. Pharm J. In press. |
| 5. Bell HM, McElnay JC, Hughes CM, Woods A. Pharmacists' attitudes towards pharmaceutical care: a qualitative approach. Pharm J 1997;259:R29. |