The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7114 September 16, 2000
Pharmacy Practice Research
Papers presented at the British Pharmaceutical Conference,
Birmingham, September 10 to 13, 2000 pR39
Wiltshire's Pharmacy First campaign
By S. H. Rugg and J. Loader
|
Introduction Unnecessary visits to their surgeries by patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) seeking inappropriate antibiotic therapy are a burden on already over-stretched general medical practitioner (GP) services1 and increase the problem of antibiotic resistance.2
The aim of this project was to reduce demands on GP time by reinforcing to the public that their local pharmacist's advice and recommendations on over-the-counter (OTC) remedies were more appropriate than antibiotic therapy.
Funding was provided by Wiltshire health authority as part of an on-going drive to support the development of the role of the community pharmacist, promote working relationships across the primary care team and help minimise unnecessary GP consultations as has been successful in other areas.3
Method Six general medical practices and five pharmacies took part. A project manager co-ordinated a series of steering group meetings, to establish the project and subsequently to collate and analyse feedback and data generated by the project.
Posters and leaflets containing the key messages (why self-help for minor ailments was best, why antibiotic therapy was not recommended) were produced for display in practices and pharmacies. Pharmacists incorporated leaflets into all dispensed prescriptions throughout the project's duration. A local publicity drive was launched to support the campaign.
Agreed protocols for patient counselling by pharmacy staff were drawn up and circulated to the GPs.
Fast-tracking (a GP appointment within 24 hours) of patients who had been counselled and considered by pharmacists to be genuinely in need of treatment was ensured by provision of a GP referral note. Patients who had consulted their GP but did not require antibiotic therapy were given a referral card to present at the pharmacy for advice and counselling. Such appointments were believed by participating GPs to provide an opportunity for future patient education.
All staff working in participating practices and pharmacies were instructed in the aims of the campaign and their opinions and findings used later in the data-collection element of the project. Postal surveys were circulated to a sample of patients registered with the participating practices to determine their awareness of the campaign and to try to predict behaviour with future URTIs. Practice and pharmacy staff were asked to record all visits, to either surgery or pharmacy, and all sales of OTC remedies, and were later circulated with questionnaires to establish how valuable they believed the campaign to have been in terms of altering patient behaviour and expectations, and furthering relationships within the primary health care team.
|
Focal points
- Patients were encouraged to seek advice and over-the-counter remedies from their pharmacist rather than seeking antibiotics from their GP for URTIs
- The scheme reduced GP workload and encouraged patients to accept responsibility for their health
- Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics was discouraged and patients educated about appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing
- Some patients acknowledged that the scheme would change their behaviour next time they had symptoms of an URTI
|
Results Significant positive local press coverage was obtained for the campaign.
The response rates to all three surveys was good: patient survey, 880 responses (63 per cent); practice staff, 41 responses (60 per cent); pharmacy staff, 28 responses (70 per cent).
Analysis of the patient questionnaire results was encouraging. The majority (78 per cent) reported that advice received from either GP or pharmacy was helpful. Significantly more respondents who had heard of the campaign indicated that they would approach their pharmacy for advice, if they caught a cold or 'flu in the next week than those who had not heard of the campaign (36 per cent v 21 per cent).
The scheme was valued by both practice and pharmacy staff, particularly as a vehicle for strengthening working relationships.
Most staff (62 per cent) expressed a wish to participate in similar initiatives in the future, and said they would recommend them to colleagues.
Discussion The implications of this study for the role community pharmacies can play in altering patient behaviour are considerable. However, a disappointing 13 per cent of public respondents still claimed they would see a GP for antibiotics next time, despite awareness of the campaign, illustrating a need for ongoing enforcement of the "no antibiotics" message.
It is hoped that in the future this type of project can be extended throughout Wiltshire and consideration is being given to extending the referral scheme to include more minor ailments.
Wiltshire health authority
References
| 1. Thomas JM, Walker R. Impact of a practice booklet on the management of illness on workload in one medical practice. Pharm J 1999;263:R47. |
| 2. Standing Medical Advisory Committee Subgroup on Antimicrobial Resistance. The path of least resistance. London: Department of Health, September 1998. |
| 3. Anon. GP-pharmacy referral trial in Bootle. Pharm J 2000;264:168. |