|
Introduction Estimates suggest that 15-20 per cent of the United Kingdom population have access to the internet.1 Over 40 per cent of public library authorities now have internet access in at least one branch (S. Woodhouse, personal communication, January, 2000). In Greater Manchester every public library (except one) provides at least two public access internet terminals.
Methods Patient information can be customised by identifying and tracking a patient accessing a website. One method involves using a "cookie", which can store small amounts of information and be used as a means to identify a patient. It can also allow patients to control other parameters such as text size, which may benefit them.4
|
Focal points
|
Discussion The development of database-driven personalised information systems that enable relevant information to be delivered to patients is likely to have greater impact than present delivery methods. Provision of professionally reviewed links to further information adds to the benefits the web offers, allowing patients access to as much or as little information about their condition as they desire. The net result is expected to be improved patient education.
A natural evolution of this system would be to extend the range of patient information available to include data such as appointments, test results, and communication tools as proposed in NHSnet. However, it is important to evaluate the use of such systems.
Current studies involve rheumatology and diabetic patients. Their desire and ability to access such a site is being assessed, along with an exploration of their pre-conceptions about the internet.
School of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, University of Manchester; *division of academic pharmacy practice, University of Leeds
| 1. Nua Internet Survey 2000. How many online. Available from: URL: http:// www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/ [accessed Feb 2000]. |
| 2. Raynor DK, Knapp P. Do patients read and retain the new mandatory medicines information leaflets? Pharm J 2000;264: 268-70. |
| 3. Jones R et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. Br Med J 1999;319: 1241-7. |
| 4. Frost M et al. Importance of format and design in print patient information. Cancer Practice 1999;7:22-7. |