|
Introduction In April, 1998, the House of Lords science and technology committee concluded that there were wide variations in antimicrobial prescribing practice, that many prescriptions were unjustified on clinical grounds and that where an antibiotic was clinically indicated, the choice of agent was often inappropriate.1 The committee recommended that health authorities (HAs) should develop formularies and evidence-based guidelines, and step up their efforts in audit, feedback and educational outreach. The standing medical advisory committee (SMAC) reported in September, 1998, that the evidence that use of antimicrobials - whether appropriate or not - causes resistance was overwhelming; that there was excessive prescribing for trivial and non-bacterial infections; and that resistance was greatest where use of antibiotics was heaviest.2
Antibacterial prescribing frequency in 1999 was higher than the England average in all but two HAs. Prescribing rates declined sharply after publication of the House of Lords report; more than 4.9 million prescriptions for antibacterials were dispensed in the region in 1999, 11.5 per cent less than in 1998 (range 8.0-13.9 per cent). Prescribing of cephalosporins and related beta-lactam antibiotics varied more than threefold, from 1.7 prescriptions/100 STAR-PUs in one HA to 5.5 (this HA had the highest prescribing rate in the region). Prescribing of quinolones was low in comparison with other antibacterials, but with a twofold variation, from 0.6 to 1.2 prescriptions per 100 STAR-PUs. Prescribing of cephalosporins and related drugs declined as a proportion of all antibacterials overall and in 11 out of 13 HAs. Similarly, the percentage of all antibacterial prescriptions written for quinolones declined overall, and in five out of 13 HAs. Mean trimethoprim course lengths varied widely, but the percentage of prescriptions for three days' treatment rose sharply in all 13 HAs; one HA achieved an increase from 8 per cent to 21 per cent, and the regional mean increased from 4 per cent to 14 per cent. |
Focal points
|
Discussion Overall, antibiotic prescribing improved in line with recent recommendations. However, absolute levels of prescribing remain high, a profile which is determined only in part by demographic and morbidity factors.
Reductions in cephalosporin prescribing are welcome, as these antibiotics (including third generation agents) are increasingly associated with resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter species. Fluoroquinolones are the most powerful antibacterials to be used at significant volumes in the community and the SMAC report expressed
concern at the extent of their use and associated resistance, including methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas species, and many enteric pathogens. Decreased prescribing seen in five HAs is therefore welcome, but relative use of quinolones increased in eight HAs. The sharp increase in three-day courses of trimethoprim in all HAs is the greatest visible response to the House of Lords and SMAC recommendations.
Although these trends are encouraging, much inappropriate prescribing still occurs and this needs to be addressed vigorously by primary care groups and trusts. Further work in progress will explore the relationship between prescribing profiles and local antibiotic policies.
NHS Executive, Northern and Yorkshire Regional Office, Durham, UK; *Regional Public Health Laboratory Service, Leeds, UK NHS Executive, Northern and Yorkshire Regional Office, Durham, and *Public Health Laboratory Service, Leeds, UK
| 1. House of Lords select committee on science and technology. 7th Report. Resistance to antibiotics and other antimicrobial agents. London: Stationery Office; 1998. Available from: URL: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldhome.htm. |
| 2. Standing medical advisory committee. Report of sub-group on antimicrobial resistance. The path of least resistance. London: Department of Health; 1998. Available from: URL: http://www.doh.gov.uk/ smac1.htm. |