Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7114 p444
September 23, 2000 Letters

Emergency Contraception

Incumbent on society

From Mr P. Walton, MRPharmS

SIR,—Mr Honigman (PJ, September 2, p332) feels that pharmacists supplying emergency hormonal contraception without a condom may be condoning unprotected, dangerous sex. It is my observation, as a pharmacist who has supplied EHC on protocol, that many girls presenting for emergency hormonal contraception say they have used condoms that have split, and that the vast majority are consenting adults (which is born out in Manchester, Salford and Trafford statistics). Most people who present for EHC tell stories that would indicate that they are in stable relationships (although this information is never asked for).
Society is currently telling its young that the best form of protection from sexually transmitted diseases is to use condoms, which are unfortunately less effective than oral contraceptives or intra-uterine devices. Surely, then, when condoms split, it is incumbent on society to provide emergency backup services to protect against unwanted pregnancy.
I wonder whether Mr Honigman realises that condoms and family planning leaflets are issued with EHC by pharmacists, and that further contraception issues are raised as a part of the protocol.

 

Philip Walton
Swinton,
Manchester