Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7116 p490
September 30, 2000 The Conference

Crystal structures aid rational design of new anticancer drugs

The speakers at the symposium: (left to right), back row, Dr Griffin, Professor Denny,
Dr Johnson and Professor Potter; front row, Professor Hecht and Professor Hurley

The determination of protein crystal structures complexed with small molecule inhibitors was an invaluable aid to guiding the design of new anticancer drugs, suggested Dr Roger Griffin (anticancer drug discovery initiative, University of Newcastle).
In the first of two examples of crystallography-led rational inhibitor design, Dr Griffin described the development of inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The CDK enzymes and their “partner” cyclins were important in the control of the cell cycle, particularly at checkpoints, he said. Inhibition of these enzymes might arrest cell cycle progression and block the growth of tumours. CDKs were serine-threonine protein kinases and so had an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding site that could be targeted for drug design, he added. [In a similar way to tyrosine kinases described on p489, CDKs catalyse transfer of phosphoryl groups from ATP to serine and threonine groups of the substrate protein].
In collaboration with researchers at the University of Oxford, purine- and pyrimidine-based inhibitors of CDK-1 and CDK-2 had been identified, said Dr Griffin. The compounds demonstrated a competitive activity that was comparable with the benchmark CDK inhibitor, olomoucine. Studying the crystal structure of a substituted purine, O6-cyclohexylmethylguanine (NU2058) in complex with CDK-2, identified a triplet of hydrogen bonding (Glu81 to NH-9, Leu83 to 2-NH2 and N-3). This hydrogen-bonding was also displayed by the pyrimidine compound, 2,6-diamino-4-cyclohexylmethyloxy-5-nitrosopyrimidine (NU6027). Olomoucine, which had a similar structure to NU2058, bound in a different orientation. Such differences in binding were reflected in a pattern of cellular sensitivities for NU2058 and NU6027 that were distinct from olomoucine.
The second example of structure-based design concerned an enzyme involved in DNA repair, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, PARP, said Dr Griffin. This was a ubiquitous nuclear enzyme with an absolute requirement for DNA damage for activation and, as such, was implicated in resistance to several DNA-damaging anticancer agents and radiation therapy.
Agents that inhibited PARP and enhanced such treatments were now being designed. These bound to the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) cofactor binding site located in one of the three domains of the PARP enzyme.
Among several promising classes of inhibitors, the benzimidazole-4-carboxamides showed particular affinity for the NAD+ binding site (IC50 2.5nM), said Dr Griffin. Examination of the crystal structures of these compounds complexed with the catalytic domain of PARP identified extensive interactions between the agents and the a-carbon backbone of the protein. In assays of cell growth inhibition, sub-micromolar concentrations of novel benzimidazoles significantly enhanced the activity of both the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, and the DNA-methylating agent, temozolomide, Dr Griffin concluded.