Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7118 p542
October 14, 2000 Clinical

Call for wider availability of cholinesterase inhibitors

An end to “postcode prescribing” of cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease was needed, Professor Gordon Wilcock (professor of care of the elderly, University of Bristol) indicated recently. He said that the drugs were “modestly effective” in treating cognitive impairment and this symptomatic approach to treatment was an important step forward. However, in many areas there was no NHS funding for the drugs.
Cholinesterase inhibitors were being evaluated by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). “There is so much evidence now that the drugs can produce some benefit. I hope NICE will assess the evidence objectively and am cautiously optimistic that the drugs will become more widely available,” Professor Wilcock said.
Speaking on October 6 at a conference organised by the Royal Society of Medicine, Professor Wilcock said that 30 to 50 per cent of patients would respond to cholinesterase inhibitors in a meaningful way, with measurable improvement in cognition which would be maintained for at least six, and possibly 12, months. The drugs also had beneficial effects on behaviour and reduced the time that carers had to spend supervising and helping patients. It was not surprising that some patients did not respond to the drugs, given the genetic and clinical heterogeneity of Alzheimer’s disease.
Discussing guidelines for treatment, Professor Wilcock said that the drugs might be tried in patients with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease (mild to moderate) of more than six months’ duration.
The early response, particularly with respect to side effects, should be assessed after about two weeks. Upper gastrointestinal effects were the most likely to occur but did not generally cause a problem. At three months, the patient should be assessed to see whether treatment had had any effect on cognition, the patient’s day-to-day life or the carer. After that, it was important to re-evaluate treatment every six months to see whether improvement was maintained.
Deciding when to stop treatment could be difficult. It should be stopped early in cases of poor tolerance or poor compliance. It should also be stopped if there was continued deterioration (at the pre-treatment rate) after three to six months, or if a patient on maintenance treatment showed accelerating deterioration (ie, if it appeared that benefit was not being maintained). Another reason for stopping would be if a drug-free period (of four to six weeks) suggested that treatment was no longer helping.
Outlining newer approaches to treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, Professor Wilcock said that researchers were examining the potential for disease modifying (neuroprotective) approaches to combat the development of amyloid protein and the formation of neurofibrillary tangles. Strategies included prevention of cleavage of amyloid precursor protein to produce amyloid protein and immunisation against formation of amyloid, which was showing promising results in animal studies.
A number of other therapeutic strategies had also been tested, including the use of antioxidants, such as vitamin E. Antioxidants had a possible neuroprotective effect although the evidence was not yet strong enough to recommend their use.
Epidemiological data showed that women taking hormone replacement therapy had less chance of developing Alzheimer’s disease and that those who did get the disease did so later than women not taking HRT. However, attempts to treat Alzheimer’s disease with HRT had not worked, so it appeared that it had more of a protective effect. There were also epidemiological data showing that people taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had a slower rate of deterioration in Alzheimer’s disease but, as with HRT, no compelling evidence yet existed to recommend these drugs for treatment.
Some trials had indicated that Ginkgo biloba might be of benefit. “It is not sufficiently proven to advise patients to take it, but there is no reason to say no. In my area, where cholinesterase inhibitors are not funded, if the patient or carer wants to do something we suggest they could try vitamin E or ginkgo,” Professor Wilcock said.