Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7118 p563-565
October 14, 2000 Pharmacy education

Incorporating good pharmaceutical practice in undergraduate education

By T. E. Kairuz, DipPharm, MPharm and N. T. Naidoo, BScPharm, PhD

This article outlines the teaching of good pharmaceutical practice
to pharmacy undergraduates at the University of Port Elizabeth,
South Africa

Accuracy and technique are but two of the essential components of good pharmaceutical practice

Good pharmaceutical practice is a broad term encompassing the safe use and therapeutic efficacy of dispensed medicines. The recent case of the dispensing of a defective medicine due to a pharmaceutical error1 highlights the need for a discussion within the profession. Certain areas come to mind: the relevance of undergraduate training; dispensing errors made; and the continuous professional development of pharmacists.
Dispensing errors can occur due to dosages or ingredients that are calculated incorrectly, prescriptions and labels that are read incorrectly, patient or product details that are entered onto the label incorrectly, and the attachment of the label onto the incorrect item. In a recent American study, it was found that in an ambulatory care pharmacy, interruptions and distractions over a half-hour period were associated with dispensing errors, a majority of which involved incorrect label information.2
Much has changed since the early 1900s when pharmacists were trained during a period of apprenticeship under the auspices of a qualified pharmacist. The pharmacist’s professional responsibility was, and still is, to ensure the proper storage, handling, dispensing, purity and legal status of drugs. Today, however, the profession is embracing the contemporary term “pharmaceutical care”, which can be defined as “the pharmacist’s responsibility for provision of drug therapy for the purposes of achieving definite outcomes that improve a patient’s quality of life”.
However, in private community and hospital pharmacies throughout the world, the conflict between commercialism and professionalism is still apparent in the practice of pharmacy. The commercial environment of pharmacy necessitates that economic factors influence much of its practice, especially when the pharmacist’s reimbursement is based on the number of prescriptions dispensed. A division between pharmacists who are mostly concerned with the accurate and efficient distribution of prescriptions, and those who are more concerned with providing information and services to ensure optimum drug therapy usually occurs.3 Pharmacy students no doubt have to be trained and educated to cope with both these aspects.
The curriculum of the pharmacy department at the University of Port Elizabeth in South Africa is evolving to cater for the chemical/pharmaceutical aspects as well as the clinical/pharmacy practice elements. Hopefully its pharmacy graduates will be able to exercise pharmaceutical practice in the broadest sense through ensuring the physicochemical stability of the product, the correct dispensing thereof, and for providing the correct product information to the patient, besides being involved in optimising drug regimens when necessary.
This all round approach to the training and educating of a competent pharmacist differs from the view put forward in California, which is that two classes of pharmacists be created to cut down on the number of prescription errors and to short-circuit a predicted over-supply of registered pharmacists. Under the Californian proposal, registered dispensing pharmacists would be responsible for ensuring the distributive functions and the dispensing and labelling of prescriptions, and would also carry most of the liability burden attached to the performance of technicians, whereas pharmaceutical care practitioners would focus on patient counselling and the running of special clinics.4
In South Africa, the training and education programme produces a graduate in pharmacy in the broad sense of the word. The unit standards for competencies of entry level pharmacists, recently proposed by the South African Pharmacy Council (SAPC), are5

Chloroform-containing preparations: the potential for errors

The potential for dispensing errors is well illustrated by the variety of forms in which chloroform is available.
Chloroform water concentrate (or “aqua chlorof conc”) contains the highest concentration of chloroform at 10 per cent v/v, chloroform water double strength contains 0.5 per cent v/v and chloroform water contains 0.25 per cent v/v. Chloroform spirit, which is prepared using alcohol, contains a relatively high amount of chloroform at a strength of 5 per cent v/v.
A potential area for calculation errors could be associated with the types of chloroform excipients available. In a survey of extemporaneously prepared liquid oral preparations conducted in May, 2000, in a (local) private and a state hospital, chloroform was found to be an ingredient in a large number of preparations, with concentrated chloroform water being the most widely used in approximately one-third of the preparations. Chloroform water was found to be used in 10 per cent of the preparations, with only one preparation being made using chloroform water double strength.
Martindale’s Extra Pharmacopoeia (32nd ed) lists the following preparations with reference to chloroform: chloroform and morphine tincture, chloroform spirit, chloroform water and double strength chloroform water. The reader is referred to the British Pharmacopoeia (1998) in order to obtain the amount of chloroform in each preparation. Although chloroform water concentrate is not listed in the 1999 edition of Martindale11 while chloroform water double strength is listed, the situation was reversed in the 1993 edition.
Students or pharmacists who do not have a copy of the BP, or an older edition of Martindale to which they could refer, would have difficulty determining the concentration of chloroform in the different preparations.

However, due to the shortage of manpower, the main function of many pharmacists in the practice setting remains that of dispensing, and this trend is reflected elsewhere in the world.6
The fact that many South African pharmacists function both as dispensers of medication and as pharmaceutical care practitioners in busy hospital or community pharmacy environments may be a factor contributing to the increasing number of dispensing errors reported to the SAPC.7

Students learn how to measure the pH of an alcohol-free, sugar-free paracetamol formulation

Teaching dispensing practice
In an attempt to combine the factors mentioned above into a relevant programme for modern pharmacy students, a module on dispensing practice is undertaken during the second year of study. In order to cope with the dispensary pressures in modern pharmacy, this BPharm undergraduate module has many facets, ranging from performing calculations, compounding specific formulations and working with dispensing computer programs to dispensing proprietary items from the mock dispensary. A local computer software program (Pharmassist) is used to complete patient records and to produce the dispensing labels. The year-long module runs concurrently with one on pharmaceutical formulation. Dispensing practice provides the practical exposure to compounding and labelling which are also studied in theory. In a survey performed in 1998, it was found that many students considered the practical reinforcement of the theory, and the theoretical understanding of extemporaneous compounding, to be mutually beneficial.
Most students produce satisfactory extemporaneously prepared products. During the very first practical session, senior assistants demonstrate how not to make a pharmaceutical preparation. The students have to recognise errors such as the incorrect reading of a meniscus and the accidental use of the incorrect ingredient. Strict attention is also paid to keeping the working environment orderly, clean and tidy so as to avoid accidental dispensing or compounding errors and contamination. Techniques of standard acceptable dispensing practice are reinforced on an ongoing basis. Labelling is carried out according to the standard methods used for labelling proprietary products. Unfortunately, such stringent labelling is not usually applied in pharmacy practice, where most labels are computer-generated and there is often insufficient space for additional details.

Research projects
To maintain the educational element one expects from a university graduate, students are encouraged to embark upon their first pharmaceutical research project during the dispensing practice module. They select a topic and proceed to formulate and test their own product, also considering appropriate packaging and marketing aspects. Peer collaboration is encouraged during this section of the work, and an oral presentation of findings is given to the rest of the class. The annual visit to a local pharmaceutical manufacturing company allows students to see various processes on a large scale, reinforcing much that the students have been taught.
It is not possible to teach every aspect of dispensing, verification of prescriptions and dosages and all the other elements that fall within the scope of the practice of pharmacy, during this single module. Students are also expected to complete a minimum of 240 hours over a period of three years, working in a pharmacy of their choice (these hours do not constitute part of the preregistration internship that is completed at the end of the undergraduate degree).
One must also equip students with the skills to develop protocols for good pharmaceutical practice once they enter the profession. This is in agreement with the editorial comment which stated that “protocols should be established and calculations should be checked and checked again and recorded systematically”.8 Applied pharmaceutical practice in a clinical environment was introduced at the University of Port Elizabeth in 2000. Students are encouraged to work in groups and to explore ways of making a hospital or pharmacy environment safer and more hygienic and to develop systems that avoid accidental contamination, including cross-contamination, incorrect dispensing and calculation errors.

Students learn the use of dispensary software in small groups, after which they enter prescription and patient details individually

Pharmacy students and calculations
The area that causes most consternation among students is that of pharmaceutical calculations. A pass in mathematics at school-leaving level is one of the prerequisites for conditional acceptance into the pharmacy programme. However, it is more often the arithmetic that needs attention, and it is arithmetical errors that often creep into pharmacy dispensing errors. To draw students’ attention to arithmetical errors, a test of 14 simple pharmaceutical calculations is done at the beginning of the year. The incorrect answers are graded according to the type of error made. A type I error (which occurs frequently) indicates that the student has the correct digits in the answer, but the decimal place is incorrect. In type II errors, the answer has no correct digits, and the arithmetical methodology used is incorrect. Type III errors are where a percentage has been calculated incorrectly, which occurs surprisingly often.
The module on dispensing practice provides opportunities for students to practise doing calculations in various ways, including the following:

Students are encouraged to verify their answers by using an alternative method of calculation. This is in accordance with International Pharmaceutical Federation recommendations, which state that all calculations should be double-checked.10 In order to allow registered pharmacists the opportunity of practising their pharmaceutical calculation skills, a regular mini-feature could be included in pharmaceutical journals, with worked examples to provide a service to the profession.
Conclusion
No system can be better than the best person operating it. No syllabus is foolproof, no training absolute. Perhaps educators and pharmacists world-wide could collaborate in educating undergraduates and encouraging colleagues in these aspects of good pharmaceutical practice.

Therèse Kairuz currently lectures on pharmaceutics to second-year pharmacy students and on biopharmaceutics to fourth-year students. Professor Raj Naidoo is head of Port Elizabeth university’s pharmacy department

References

  1. Anon. Boots pharmacist and trainee cleared of baby’s manslaughter, but fined for dispensing a defective medicine. Pharm J 2000;264:390-2.
  2. Flynn EA, Barker KN, Gibson T, Pearson RE, Berger BA, Smith LA. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health-System Pharm 1999;56:1319-25.
  3. Sleath B, Campbell W. American pharmacy: a profession in the final stage of dividing? J Soc Admin Pharm 1998;15:225-40.
  4. Ukens C. Should pharmacy be split into two licensure groups? Drug Topics 1997; May: 52.
  5. Draft unit standards for entry level pharmacists. Pretoria: Pharmacy Council of South Africa; 1997.
  6. Rutter PM, Hunt AJ, Darracott R, Jones IF. Validation of a subjective evaluation study using work sampling. J Soc Admin Pharm 1999;16:174-85.
  7. South African Pharmacy Council. Council concerned about dispensing errors. Pharmaciae 2000;8:22.
  8. Anon. The death of a child. Pharm J 2000:264;389.
  9. FIP Statement of Professional Standards: medication errors associated with prescribed medication. SA Pharm J 2000:67;45-8.
  10. Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 1982. p746.
  11. Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 32nd ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 1999. p1221