Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7122 p717
November 11, 2000 Letters

Veterinary medicines

Concern at lack of action

From Mr R. Jones, MRPharmS

SIR,—I am very concerned at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s apparent lack of action over the review of veterinary medicines that is under way at present (PJ, November 4, p671).
This is a massive opportunity for pharmacy. It could release many products from the prescription-only medicine category and even provide veterinary prescriptions for dispensing.
In rural areas it could safeguard pharmaceutical services and make the pharmacy the centre of human and veterinary medicines. In urban areas it would open up whole new product ranges for companion animals.
This review is well highlighted in the farming press but pharmacy appears to be ignoring it. Where is the vision from our leaders?
We need Lambeth to put a task force together to make sure we grasp this opportunity and finally release the potential for all medicines in pharmacy.

Rod Jones
Hay on Wye, Herefordshire

Ms LIZ GRIFFITHS (secretary, Veterinary Pharmacists Group) responds: The Society wishes to assure its members that it views the current consultation as a great opportunity for pharmacy. The Veterinary Pharmacists Group dedicated its entire annual conference this year to the review. Key people from all the interested parties were invited to speak. They included the immediate past president of the British Veterinary Association, the director of the National Office of Animal Health, a representative from the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, and Sir John Marsh, the chairman of the review group. All VPG members received an invitation to this conference and thereby the opportunity to contribute to this extremely important debate. I have since received a personal letter of thanks from Sir John, who found the weekend very informative and valuable.
The Society arranged a visit for the independent review group to an agricultural and veterinary pharmacy, where the advantages of greater pharmacy involvement were stressed. The Society has formally presented its arguments to the BVA and the NOAH annual conferences. The comments arising from these will inform the Society’s response.
Members of the VPG committee, who represent the interests of the group, have been given the opportunity to submit their views, comments and evidence. The Society has liaised with the National Pharmaceutical Association, which will also be submitting a separate response on behalf of pharmacy. Following the submission of its written response by the end of November, the Society will be offering verbal evidence to the review group in December.