Return to PJ Online Home Page
The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 265 No 7125 p804
December 02, 2000 Onlooker

Bones of contention

When in 1996 a human skeleton was discovered on the banks of the Columbia River near Kennewick in Washington State, controversy erupted after it was given a radiocarbon date of 9,300 years. Five native American tribes claimed that the individual was an ancestor of tribes now living in the vicinity, and was entitled under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to be handed to his descendants for reburial. But anthropologists who wished to examine it in detail disputed the legal judgment that this course was in order.
As commentators in Science for September 29 and Nature for October 5 have explained, United States scientists are disputing the ruling of the US Department of the Interior. This is because they wish to study bone mineralisation, to obtain specimens of DNA to give an indication of ancestry, and to make detailed skeletal measurements.

Bone

Other scientists believe that the evidence of tradition establishes a sound link between the Kennewick Man and his Indian descendants, who are thought to have inhabited the region for more than 10,000 years. The only artefact associated with the skeleton is a projectile point found embedded in his pelvis, and this has Indian affinities.
It is believed that there is little chance of an amicable agreement between the parties over what shall be done but, given a little more time, some useful data might be established concerning the characteristics of the skeleton.