|
Call for changes to Controlled Drug recordingThe chief medical officer's inquiry into the circumstances that allowed
the Manchester GP Harold Shipman to get away with murdering many of his
patients undetected called for a review of the way in which Controlled
Drug dispensing is recorded in pharmacies. But a question mark has been
put over whether or not changes would make any difference. |
|
NPA board: Concerns raised over electronic signatures
The National Pharmaceutical Association's board of management has expressed reservations over the use of electronic signatures and possible prescription direction in trials of the electronic transfer of prescriptions from surgeries to pharmacies. At its February meeting, the NPA board considered a National Health Service Executive consultation letter about a POM Order amendment that was necessary to allow ETP trials to go ahead in England later this year. The proposed amendment would allow designated prescribers to sign prescriptions digitally and to transfer them electronically to designated pharmacists. Board members' concerns centred on the fact that digital signatures are electronic messages authenticated by the message recipient's computer, rather than digital representations of a handwritten signature. They felt that the proposed rules should ensure that the designated prescriber was the only person permitted to use the electronic signature. There was also concern that the proposed amendment could allow prescription direction when the key principles underpinning ETP, which had been agreed between the pharmaceutical and medical professions and the Department of Health, forbade direction of prescriptions to particular pharmacies. Other matters considered at the meeting are reported below. EHC The NPA is to write a second letter to the Daily Mail complaining about the newspaper's report on the emergency contraception service offered by Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham health action zone pharmacists (PJ, February 3, p139). The Daily Mail's response to the original complaint had been that the article had been based on information received from the HAZ project manager. Board members were aware that, although the HAZ representative had originally led the newspaper to believe that pharmacists were not following the patient group direction exactly, this was wrong and the newspaper had been told before the article was printed. The Daily Mail had chosen not to correct or withdraw its report. Board members decided not to complain to the Broadcasting Standards Commission about a Tonight with Trevor McDonald programme on the same topic (PJ, February 10, p177), which they considered to be unbalanced. The item failed to mention pharmacies that had been filmed and which had performed well and concentrated only on the age-related parts of pharmacists' consultations with an underage girl who lied about her age. Saline and the Drug Tariff A proposal to reclassify sodium chloride solution and irrigation solution as Drug Tariff appliances was opposed. Board members could not understand why saline irrigation fluids, which had always been classified as drugs, were to become appliances. What would happen to sterile water and liquid antiseptics, they wanted to know, and how would community pharmacists know which fluids were drugs and which were appliances? There was also concern that the dispensing fee for appliances was 85p compared to 97.5p for drugs. Out-of-hours services A model for a community pharmacy-led out-of-hours pharmaceutical service which met the requirements of a Department of Health out-of-hours review was approved (PJ, November 18, 2000, p745). Meeting demands for new pharmaceutical services in primary care would help to provide a secure future for community pharmacists. Nevertheless, there were concerns about the likely demand for out-of-hours pharmaceutical services and how the model would be funded. There was also a question-mark over whether or not out-of-hours pharmacies should sell over-the-counter medicines. Meeting with Lord Hunt The NPA chairman (Mr Ben Zatland) and chief executive (Mr John D'Arcy) had met Lord Hunt (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health) on February 19. They stressed the importance of the pharmacy network as a means of securing access to pharmaceutical services. Responding to concerns expressed by Lord Hunt about recent publicity about the availability of EHC from pharmacies, they said that most of the coverage had been misleading. The opportunity was taken to say that many pharmacists were uncomfortable with the 16 year age limit associated with OTC EHC, given that PGD supplies were based upon competence to comprehend rather than age. There was no logical or clinical need for this age restriction. |