|
Problem chemistry |
Problem chemistryIt is somewhat alarming to note that the number of sixth-form students applying to study chemistry at university is declining in the United Kingdom, and that among those who study the subject to degree level or beyond there are more and more who go on to pursue careers outside the strict realm of chemistry. As Deborah Gaskell comments in the February issue of Chemistry in Britain, there are many temptations offered to chemistry graduates to turn to accountancy, banking or information technology. Almost always these bring in more money, with less delay. Up to a decade ago industrial or academic chemistry offered a challenging career and a promising future. But in today's climate, to admit to being a professional chemist may generate hostility and distrust in acquaintances. The public has grown suspicious of scientists in general, in the wake of squabbles over genetic engineering and the flood of toxic and hazardous agrochemicals affecting our environment and the countryside. Chemists, it is thought, now expect to endure the sort of distrust traditionally associated with traffic wardens, tax inspectors, journalists and, more lately, politicians and lawyers. Much of the trouble arises because chemists are unable or unwilling to explain with any degree of transparency to the public what it is they do and mean. Moreover, academic chemistry departments are today starved of funds. Chemistry graduates are often assumed by ignorant employers to be overqualified for comfort. Times are particularly hard for women chemists, since part-time academics are rarely accommodated by institutions. The teaching of communication skills which might enlighten some of the ignorant and misunderstanding is inadequate. There is reluctance to provide adequate facilities for women chemists. Chemists who become involved in pharmacology and the production and testing of pharmaceutical products have to contend with public fears concerning the testing of new compounds on animals, even if this occurs only in the last resort. Yet there is no need to write off chemistry as one aspect of research. Chemists must expand and broaden their role and not specialise too rigidly. Employers in industry recognise this better than institutions. But the prospect is not bright.
|