Consistent care and medication reviews improve the
quality of prescribing in nursing homes
The care of residents in nursing homes can be improved
by regular visits from a specific general practitioner, with regular medication
reviews by a pharmacist, rather than ad hoc visits by several GPs, according
to Dr IAN WALTON from Birmingham.
Dr Walton from Horseley Heath Surgery in Tipton
compared the prescribing patterns of a nursing home that was attended
by one GP with those of a home visited by several. He found that homes
with several different GPs and no pharmacist have less control over prescribing
and cannot sustain any changes made to prescriptions.
Dr Walton said that he had had mixed feelings when
a large nursing home had been built opposite his surgery, but he had taken
on responsibility for nearly all of its residents. In the other four homes
in the area, a number of GPs provided care for the residents when required,
and none of the homes had a pharmacist to review medication.
The pharmacist who worked in Dr Waltons practice
had undertaken medication reviews for all of the residents and, with Dr
Walton, had set up prescribing protocols. These included instituting a
28-day supply rule for all prescriptions (to prevent the issuing of 56-day
prescriptions every 28 days), rationalising as required analgesia, and
reducing the number of types of catheter, emollients, enteral feeds and
dressings used. As a result, the annual spend on emollients had been reduced
by 80 per cent, on catheters by 50 per cent, on enteral feeds by 25 per
cent, and the cost of each dressing change by at least £1. The prescribing
of drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors and hypnotics, had also declined.
Dr Walton estimated the annual savings per patient to be about £300, with
potential savings on dressings of about £1,000 per patient per year.
Dr Walton had assessed the service that he was providing
by comparing the prescribing patterns and costs at his home with those
at others in the area. He found that the incidence of polypharmacy, unnecessary
brand prescribing and inappropriate repeat prescribing was higher in the
other homes. In addition, changes that had been made to prescriptions
were less likely to have been sustained, he claimed.
Back to Top
|