| The Pharmaceutical
Journal Vol 266 No 7150 p736-738 June 2, 2001 |
News summary NPA calls for ban on promotions
and a review of the GSL classification criteria The National
Pharmaceutical Association has called for a legal ban on three-for-two
promotions for medicines and for a review of the law and guidelines that
govern the reclassification of pharmacy medicines as safe for general
sale...[more] |
PAGB invites bids for research fundingThe Proprietary Association of Great Britain is inviting bids for up to £25,000 from a fund that supports research into what community-based health professionals are doing to encourage self-care. Eligible research projects are likely to be based in community and primary care settings and address such questions as
Projects will be expected to produce results of sufficient quality to be published in peer-reviewed literature. Short-listed applicants will be asked to submit detailed proposals in advance of an interview with a research board on December 6. Application forms can be obtained from Libby Whittaker, PAGB, Vernon House, Sicilian Avenue, London WC1A 2QS (tel: 020 7421 9318, e-mail: libby.whittaker@pagb.co.uk). |
Patient-centred flexible care by fewer pharmacies is vision of the futureAs a profession, we have not shaped care around patients. So said Professor Steve Chapman, professor of prescribing sciences at Keele University, who gave the keynote address at the first Primary Care Pharmacy conference held at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society on May 24. The NHS Plan makes it clear that we have to do this. All the rest is just window dressing, Professor Chapman said. He went on to point out that the plan was about pharmacists not pharmacies and that there may not be as many pharmacies in the future. This is no bad thing, he said. The plan Pharmacy in the future laid down three challenges, Professor Chapman explained. The first was to meet the changing needs of patients, which included having access to medicines and pharmaceutical advice when and where they wanted it, and more support when using medicines. Much good work had already begun in medicines management, but it needed to be spread more widely. The National Prescribing Centre and Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee initiatives were catalysts. The second challenge for pharmacists was to respond to the changing commercial and technological environment; the third was to ensure that patients were confident that they were getting good advice. Professor Chapman emphasised deadlines set in the plan. By 2002, there should be a greater range of over-the-counter medicines in pharmacies, better access to medicines out of hours which meant more than re-organising rotas and NHS Direct would be sending patients to pharmacies. In other words, there would be more deregulation and improved access. Repeat dispensing schemes, the cornerstone of medicines management, which could be used to sort out issues such as concordance, had to be in place by 2004 and would enhance the role of pharmacists, provided they had the time to do it properly. By 2008, electronic prescribing would be the norm, and as part of this continuum, e-pharmacy would grow swiftly. Channelling energy into resistance was foolish. Pharmacist prescribing was important, but was not the be all and end all of the profession. It needed to be put into perspective alongside other initiatives because pharmacists had vital skills in medicines management and in helping patients and other health care professionals. Pharmacists would have to work more flexibly as part of a team, and having a good relationship with local practices would have to be the norm, not the exception. Undoubtedly, the national contract would change to allow the development of one-stop centres with pharmacists in them. Pharmacists needed to divest themselves of responsibilities like dispensing, delegate it to others, and spend more time on individual patients clinical needs. See also Forum |