| The Pharmaceutical
Journal Vol 266 No 7152 p803-804 June 16, 2001 |
Clinical Pharmacy News summary International cancer trials
update Results from three major trials showing the value of
chemotherapy after surgery and the use of docetaxol as an alternative
to paclitaxel in treating ovarian cancer were presented at this years
annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, held in San
Francisco last month. The trials recruited patients from the United Kingdom...[more] |
International cancer trials updateResults from three major trials showing the value of chemotherapy after surgery and the use of docetaxol as an alternative to paclitaxel in treating ovarian cancer were presented at this years annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, held in San Francisco last month. The trials recruited patients from the United Kingdom. The ICON-1 (International Collaboration on Ovarian Neoplasms) and ACTION (Adjuvant Treatment in Ovarian Neoplasms) trials both sought to answer the question of whether cytotoxic chemotherapy is of value after surgery for patients with very small, localised ovarian tumours (FIGO stage I-IIa). Both studies were of a similar design: patients were randomised to platinum-based chemotherapy (with a high degree of investigator discretion in the choice of regimen) or no treatment following surgery. Both studies showed a clear advantage, in terms of disease-free survival, to patients who received chemotherapy. In a combined analysis of 925 patients, disease-free survival five years after randomisation was increased from 65 per cent to 76 per cent by chemotherapy. These trials also showed a trend towards improved overall survival for chemotherapy recipients, although this only reached statistical significance in ICON-1, where five year overall survival was increased from 75 per cent to 82 per cent (P=0.01) by cytotoxic treatment. Chemotherapy appeared to be of no benefit to those patients for whom sufficient pathological evidence had been available to assign their disease stage unequivocally. Dr Ignace Vergote, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium, who presented the data, suggested that the true value of chemotherapy may be to those with bulkier disease (larger tumours) than that suggested by their staging within the trial. In another presentation, Dr Paul Vasey of the SCOTROC (Scottish randomised trial in ovarian cancer) group said that docetaxel may represent an alternative to paclitaxel in the combination treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The combination of paclitaxel and a platinum complex (usually carboplatin) is the internationally accepted standard of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. In an attempt to improve on this regimen, the SCOTROC group compared the standard regimen (PC) of paclitaxel (175mg/m2) plus a standard dose of carboplatin every three weeks for six cycles with a similar regimen (DC) in which docetaxel (75mg/m2) was substituted for paclitaxel. The investigators hoped that the new combination would prove more potent than the original it was powered to detect 25 per cent superiority in either arm and produce less neurotoxicity. In fact, in terms of efficacy, both regimens appear to be identical. Response rates were 76 per cent and 75 per cent for PC and DC, respectively, and one-year progression-free survival (assessed after a median follow-up of eight months) was identical for the two study groups. Although DC did produce less neurotoxicity than PC during and after treatment, it was more myelotoxic, and resulted in more febrile neutropenia and a greater requirement for use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to maintain patients white blood cell counts. All of the abstracts for the ASCO meeting and many
of the full presentations are available on the ASCO website (www.asco.org). Forum p833 |
NICE guidance on lung cancer issuedThe National Institute for Clinical Excellence has issued guidance on the use of gemcitabine (Gemzar), paclitaxel (Taxol), docetaxel (Taxotere) and vinorelbine (Navelbine) for treating lung cancer in England and Wales. The NICE recommends that the use of these drugs should be considered as an option for patients who are not suitable for, or who are unlikely to respond to, potentially curative treatment. They should also be considered as part of the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The NICE advises that the most effective form of treatment is likely to be any one of these drugs in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. A recommendation that docetaxel should be considered as monotherapy for treating patients whose cancer is locally advanced or has metastasised has also been made. However, the NICE says that the recommendation should only be considered if the patient has suffered a relapse after receiving initial chemotherapy with other agents. Estimations of how many patients currently receive chemotherapy for lung cancer vary between 1,320 and 5,280 per year. The NICE adds that if these patients switch to a combination of a platinum-based chemotherapy together with one or more of the four drugs there would be an increase in National Health Service spending of between £3.8m and £15.3m per year. The NICE also points out that, because these drugs cause fewer side effects than older chemotherapeutic agents, their use is likely to increase with time. This, it says, will increase costs but might allow more care to be provided in outpatient rather than in inpatient settings. Copies of the full guidance are available on the NICE website (www.nice.org.uk). |
NICE guidance on induction of labour issuedThe NICE has issued a national guideline on the induction of labour. The guideline is a summary of a full guideline published by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and provides evidence-based recommendations for the induction of labour, including the use of prostaglandins and oxytocin. The full guideline is available on the RCOG website (www.rcog.org.uk) and the NICEs summary on the NICE website (www.nice.org.uk). |
Cure for baldness remains distantDutasteride, the drug hailed as a cure for baldness in recent national newspaper reports, is still in the early stages of development, according to GlaxoSmithKline, the company developing the drug. A spokeswoman for the company told The Journal this week that dutasteride (GI198745) was currently in phase II trials. If it continues to show promise within clinical trials it might reach the market in two to five years. However, this is only a general prediction, she said. Dutasteride is a dual 5-alpha reductase inhibitor that inhibits type I and type II 5-alpha reductases. It is being developed as a treatment for both benign prostatic hyperplasia and alopoecia. Dutasteride works by blocking the peripheral conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, which, at increased levels, causes the miniaturisation of hair follicles seen in male pattern hair loss. Dutasteride is in a similar class of drug to Merck Sharp & Dohmes finasteride (Propecia), although finasteride inhibits only type II 5-alpha reductase (PJ, October 30, 1999, p701). |