| The Pharmaceutical
Journal Vol 266 No 7152 p800-802 June 16, 2001 |
News summary Research team moves from Nottingham
university to the School of Pharmacy Professor David Thurstons
entire cancer research team is to leave Nottingham as a result of the
universitys decision to accept money from a tobacco company to pay
for business school developments...[more] |
|
Risk team to be led by a pharmacistA medicines risk management team is being established at the Barts and The London National Health Service Trust. It is to be led by a newly recruited principal pharmacist (PJ, June 9, pA17) and will work to reduce medicine related adverse events. Other members of the team will include a nurse and researchers, with part-time support from a doctor. Michael Cross, director of pharmacy at the Royal London Hospital, believes that risk control offers a huge growth area for pharmacy because there is a large, unmet need. |
|
Boots to launch non-threatening risk assessment programme for dispensingBoots The Chemists Ltd is to launch a dispensing incident management programme in the next few weeks. The programme will be used by its pharmacists to analyse the causes of dispensing incidents and errors. Steve Eastham, the new head of clinical governance at Boots says that the programme will encourage pharmacists to look at the whole dispensing process to identify the factors that contribute to dispensing incidents. The programme, to be sent to all Boots pharmacists, will form the basis of a protocol that pharmacists will have to follow after a dispensing incident or near miss. Mr Eastham says that there will be an emphasis on reporting near misses as the company recognises that employees will be less defensive and that more learning could come from this approach. As part of the programme, pharmacists will be expected to record details of any dispensing incidents and use the record to identify patterns. We want to get discussions going in a non-threatening and supportive way at a local level, Mr Eastham says. The reports are to be fed up through the management hierarchy so those responsible for clinical governance are aware of the issues at the dispensary level. If standard operating procedures are found to be risky then they will be challenged and changed. As part of its approach to clinical governance, the company is developing a policy aimed at driving improvements in standards. New terms have been introduced within Boots to strengthen pharmacists roles, such as pharmacist in charge and area accountable pharmacist. This is to make clear to patients who is responsible for the delivery of a service throughout the organisation. The term primary care pharmacist has been replaced with professional development pharmacist to reflect what is actually involved in the role. Bootss regional professional development managers will be involved in auditing and observing pharmacists and, where problems are identified, support programmes will be developed to help individual pharmacists. A clinical risk manager position has been introduced to examine what happens at the dispensary level, and to evaluate the risks involved with standard operating procedures. Mr Eastham accepts that pharmacists have been doing clinical governance for many years but says that the use of the term allows pharmacists to focus on improving standards. The pharmacy profession is guilty of not demonstrating what a good job it does. Clinical governance allows us to prove that we are doing a first class job and to assess our improvements over time. |
Medicine sales rise after price cutsCuts of up to 40 per cent in the prices charged by supermarkets for 12 tablet packs of Nurofen 200mg have generated increased sales of the product. So great are the additional sales that independent community pharmacists have lost 29 per cent of their market share in the first week after the end of resale price maintenance even though the actual volume of sales in pharmacies has remained virtually unchanged. Market researcher IMS Health says that independent pharmacies which kept their price unchanged saw their market share fall from 55 per cent to 39 per cent, while national multiple pharmacy companies other than Superdrug and Boots saw their market share fall by only 1 per cent. The 12 tablet pack of Nurofen was the most heavily discounted medicine in supermarkets, with prices cut by more than 40 per cent in comparison to the previously enforced price. The price of 16 tablet packs was reduced by 26 per cent. Before the lifting of RPM, supermarkets held a 39 per cent share of the market for 12 packs of Nurofen, but held 93 per cent of the market in 16 tablet packs. After the abolition of RPM, their share of the 12 tablet pack market rose from 17 per cent to 56 per cent. IMS says: The supermarkets appear to be giving greater reductions in prices for lines for which they have a lower market share where they can potentially attract the most business from pharmacies. IMS finds a similar pattern of change for Rennie tablets. In this case, grocers without pharmacies cut the price by 28 per cent after the lifting of RPM, compared to 26 per cent price cuts in grocers with pharmacies. As with Nurofen, the supermarkets saw their market share rise, this time from 60 per cent to 75 per cent, again through extra sales rather than capturing sales from pharmacies. IMS says that independent pharmacies have not rushed into lowering the prices of any of the lines it surveyed. Indeed, in some cases the average price in pharmacies has risen, possibly because pharmacists are choosing to put a value on their expertise and advice. It adds that 89 per cent of pharmacists are expecting manufacturers to discount their trade prices so that pharmacies can reduce their selling prices, and 74 per cent are expecting discounts from wholesalers. The greatest price reductions overall were in grocers that did not have pharmacies, where price cuts of at least 15 per cent were implemented. Grocers with pharmacies cut prices by at least 10 per cent. |
PSNCs nine pilot sites for medicines managementThere are to be nine pilot sites for the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committees cardiac medicines management scheme. The project has been promised at least £1.5m of government funding. The nine locations chosen are in the North Tyneside, Bradford North, Salford, Crewe and district, Burntwood Lichfield and Tamworth, Portsmouth City, and Poole Central and North primary care trusts, and the Walsall East and North Southwark primary care groups. The nine successful bids were chosen from 33 submissions, all of which have been described as good. John Dixon, the PSNCs project manager said: Credit is due to all the people who submitted bids, we could have worked with any of them. They were all good. Mr Dixon said that the researchers had chosen a good set of representative locations from the 33 bids. They are a good spread of people who are typical of the whole country. The nine locations chosen cover almost 50 medical practices with 180 doctors, and 80 community pharmacies. |