| The Pharmaceutical
Journal Vol 266 No 7153 p842-845 June 23, 2001 |
Clinical Pharmacy News summary First preventive treatment
for patients with haemorrhagic stroke A regimen of perindopril,
given alone or in combination with the diuretic indapamide, reduces the
risk of recurrent stroke irrespective of whether blood pressure is raised
or not, a new study shows...[more] |
|
Potential benefits of first human anti-TNF for rheumatoid arthritisAdalimumab, a tumour necrosis factor antibody being developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, reduces the signs and symptoms of the disease, say researchers. It is expected to offer patients potential benefits over existing anti-TNF therapies. The results of three studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (previously known as D2E7, see PJ, July 15, 2000, p100) were presented this week at the European League Against Rheumatism meeting in Prague, Czech Republic. The first, a randomised, controlled, dose-ranging study that forms part of the phase II ARMADA Trial (anti-TNF research study programme of the monoclonal antibody D2E7 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis), showed that at all the doses tested (20mg, 40mg, 80mg), adalimumab, given subcutaneously on alternate weeks for 24 weeks, was significantly better than placebo at reducing the signs and symptoms of arthritis. Patients enrolled into the study had shown only a partial response to methotrexate treatment. All treatment arms remained on methotrexate throughout the study. In the trial, clinical effectiveness was measured using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, a composite score that measures, along with other parameters, improvements in tender joint and swollen joint count. Dr Edward Keystone of the centre for advanced therapeutics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, who presented the trial data at the meeting, and colleagues, found that the 40mg dose of adalimumab was most beneficial in terms of clinical effectiveness. Of the patients who received 40mg of adalimumab on alternate weeks, 65.7 per cent achieved a 20 per cent improvement in their symptoms compared with 14.5 per cent of patients who received placebo (P<0.0001). A 50 per cent improvement was seen in 53.7 per cent of patients in the 40mg group compared with 8.1 per cent in the placebo group (P<0.0001), and a 70 per cent improvement was seen in 26.9 per cent of patients in the 40mg group compared with 4.8 per cent given placebo (P<0.003). Adverse events in patients given adalimumab were comparable to those in patients given placebo, except for an increase in the rate of injection site reactions in the adalimumab group. A total of 271 patients were enrolled in the study. All had active rheumatoid arthritis despite being treated with methotrexate, and all had failed to respond to at least one, but not more than four, disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs before methotrexate therapy was started. Dr Steven Fischkoff, global clinical director at Abbott Laboratories, said at a satellite symposium where the results of the trials were discussed that the company planned to submit an application for regulatory approval to European authorities within the first half of 2002. Asked whether the company expected adalimumab to have clinical benefits over the other anti-TNF agents currently on the market, he said: So far, no study has looked at all three anti-TNF agents together. However, adalimumab is expected to offer patients potential advantages. Since it was a fully human monoclonal antibody, patients would be expected to stay on the therapy for longer and there would be less chance of them experiencing an allergic reaction to the drug. He added that Abbott currently had no plans for direct head-to-head trials with the other anti-TNF agents. Speaking to The Journal after the symposium, Professor Paul Emery of the rheumatology and rehabilitation research unit at the University of Leeds said that anti-TNF therapies were among the most important developments in rheumatology. D2E7 [adalimumab] is an exciting advance, he said. However, he commented that rationing seen with anti-TNF drugs was a problem in the United Kingdom. Some health authorities are waiting for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence to issue guidance on these drugs before they will fund them. He added that this should not be happening because the evidence to support their use was there. Anti-TNF therapy binds to and neutralises TNF, thereby interrupting the inflammatory response associated with TNF accumulation in rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab (Remicade) and entanercept (Enbrel) are currently the only anti-TNF agents licensed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the United Kingdom. The results of other trials presented at the EULAR
meeting will be published in The Journal on June 30,2001. |
|
The Journal went to the European League Against Rheumatism meeting courtesy of Abbott Laboratories and the European Meeting on Hypertension (see p843) courtesy of Bayer |
Rheumatologists urged to think LOX not just COXA compound ML3000, which inhibits both the 5-LOX (5-lipoxygenase) and COX (cyclo-oxygenase) pathways of the inflammatory process, is effective in improving pain scores in patients with osteoarthritis, participants at the European League Against Rheumatism meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, were told on June 15. Results of several phase II studies involving ML3000 were presented at the meeting by Merckle GmbH, the company developing the drug. The data presented showed that ML3000 was effective in both osteo- and rheumatoid arthritis and had excellent gastrointestinal tolerability. Stefan Laufer, professor of pharmaceutical chemistry, University of Tuebingen, Germany, speaking at a press briefing commented: We are satisfied to see that COX-2 is not the end of the story... The data presented today make us optimistic that a treatment like ML3000, which works across the whole inflammatory process, will soon become a reality. Professor Laufer told The Journal that pre-clinical studies comparing ML3000 with one of the COX-2 inhibitors currently on the market had shown ML3000 to have a significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability profile than the COX-2 inhibitor. He added that ML3000 was now in Phase III trials and that clinical studies to compare it with COX-2 inhibitors were planned for later this year. Also speaking at the press briefing, Professor Kim Rainsford, chair of biomedical sciences at Sheffield Hallam University, said: The early success and major pharmaceutical backing for the specific COX-2 inhibitors have lead to the focus being diverted from a balanced approach to minimising the inflammatory process. An application for marketing approval of ML3000
in the European Union is expected to be filed by Merckle early in 2002. |
|
The Journal went to the European League Against Rheumatism meeting courtesy of Abbott Laboratories and the European Meeting on Hypertension (see p843) courtesy of Bayer |
Mixed results for abciximab in MI trialsCombining the fibrinolytic drug reteplase (Rapilysin) with abciximab (ReoPro), a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, reduces secondary complications of myocardial infarction but not mortality rates, according to trial results published this week. The GUSTO V (global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries) trial aimed to test the hypothesis that combined fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition improves reperfusion in patients with acute MI. The investigators randomly assigned patients to standard-dose reteplase (8,260 patients) or half-dose reteplase plus full-dose abciximab (8,328 patients). They found that, at 30 days follow-up, 488 of the patients given standard-dose reteplase had died compared with 468 of the patients on combined therapy. The statistical power of the trial meant that the investigators could show that although the combination therapy was not significantly better than reteplase, in terms of reducing mortality, it was not inferior to it. The investigators saw fewer non-fatal reinfarctions in patients given reteplase in combination with abciximab than those given reteplase alone, and there was less need for urgent revascularisation. In addition, the researchers saw fewer major non-fatal ischaemic complications of acute MI. However, there was an increase in the rate of non-intracranial bleeding complications in the patients given combination therapy, although the absolute rates were modest, say the researchers. The researchers comment that the question of whether combination therapy should be incorporated into practice will ultimately rest on other factors besides safety and efficacy, such as cost. But they add that if price is not a consideration then the combined therapy approach is desirable. The reduced morbidity and reduced need for urgent revascularisation is encouraging, even if it is partly offset by higher rates of non-intracranial bleeding, they say (Lancet 2001;357:1905). In an accompanying commentary on the trial (ibid, p1898), Dr Freek Verheugt of the University Medical Centre, St Radboud, the Netherlands, said: The concept of an improvement in early patency rates leading to a decrease in mortality was not confirmed. In GUSTO V the bottom-line in current fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy seems to have been reached and speeding up reperfusion with drugs does not seem worthwhile. GUSTO IV trial Results of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial, also published this week, suggest that abciximab is not beneficial as first-line treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes who do not undergo early revascularisation. Previous trials have shown that abciximab reduces procedure-related thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions and the risk of premature death and MI in patients with acute coronary syndromes. These benefits were seen mainly in patients undergoing early revascularisation but the GUSTO IV-ACS investigators note that many patients with acute coronary syndromes do not undergo such early procedures. They therefore conducted a randomised trial to study the effect of abciximab on patients who were not revascularised early. (Of the 7,800 patients participating in the trial, only 128 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention within 48 hours of enrolment into the trial.) Patients, who were admitted to hospital with chest pain and either ST-segment depression or raised troponin T or I concentrations (markers of myocardial necrosis), were randomised to receive placebo (n=2,598), abciximab bolus and 24 hour infusion (n=2,590), or abciximab bolus and 48 hour infusion (n=2,612). There were 209 deaths among the patients receiving placebo, compared with 212 on 24 hour abciximab, and 238 on 48 hour abciximab. This gave an odds ratio of 1.0 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.83–1.24) for the difference between placebo and 24 hour abciximab, and 1.1 (0.94–1.39) for the difference between placebo and 48 hour abciximab. The researchers conclude that patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not scheduled to undergo early revascularisation gain no benefit from intravenous abciximab during the first 24 or 48 hours after enrolment. They note that the findings are in contrast to earlier investigations and that the reasons for the differences are not completely understood (Lancet 2001;357:1915). The National Institute for Clinical Excellence issued guidance on the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in September last year (see PJ, October 7, 2000, p509). |
IBS drug fails to gain US approvalThe United States Food and Drug Administration has refused to grant marketing approval for tegaserod (Zelmac), Novartiss new treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (see PJ, May 26, p707). This follows the companys withdrawal of its marketing authorisation application in Europe last month. Novartis withdrew its application in Europe because of a disagreement between the company and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products about the drugs effectiveness. Novartis says it will be resubmitting its application for marketing approval of Zelmac in Europe but does not expect the drug to reach the European market before 2003. Novartis had, however, hoped to gain approval in the US. A spokeswoman for Novartis told The Journal
on June 19 that the FDA had requested additional information about the
drug before approval could be granted. A decision about whether to appeal
against the FDAs decision or to resubmit its application in the
US had not yet been made. |
|
The latest issue of the Merec Bulletin reviews IBS and the value of drug treatments available for this condition. The bulletin, which is produced by the National Prescribing Centre, concludes that current therapies are of limited value and have a poor evidence base (Merec Bulletin 2000;11:41). |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal