Home > PJ  > Letters

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 266 No 7153 p852-856
June 23, 2001

Letters

  Medicines promotions
  GlaxoSmithKline
  Monitired dosage systems
  The Profession
  NHS
  Parallel trading
  Dressings
  Checking technicians
  Code of Ethics
  SGM
  Onlooker
  The Journal


Letters to the Editor

GlaxoSmithKline

Information service criticised

From Mrs A. L. Barnett, MRPharmS

I read with interest the article regarding the increased vigilance that is needed to avoid interactions with amfebutamone (PJ, May 5, p611). As a medicines information pharmacist, I encounter regular enquiries regarding this drug.

I have contacted the medical information department of GlaxoSmithKline on several occasions requesting specific information on certain drugs interacting with amfebutamone. Their reply on every occasion has been unhelpful.

It is about time that GSK sorted out this inadequate service. In medicines information, it is difficult enough getting adequate information when new drugs come out, but to get a substandard service regarding a drug that is so much in the spotlight is unacceptable.

Alison Barnett
Hyde, Cheshire

 
 

Dr YVONNE GREENSTREET, medical director, GlaxoSmithKline, replies:

The medical information department at GlaxoSmithKline is committed to providing the most up-to-date scientific and clinical information to support the appropriate use of our medicines and I would like to apologise if on any occasion our service has not met the expectations of our customers.

Our team of medical information advisers are customer-focused professionals, most of whom are pharmacists who have worked in medicines information within the National Health Service. They undergo a high level of ongoing training and work closely with other scientific and medical colleagues to ensure that they are familiar with new information on our medicines as soon as it becomes available.

The department has access to a large number of external and internal clinical resources to ensure that the information we provide is as comprehensive as possible. Each enquiry is dealt with on an individual basis.

We routinely monitor the quality of our service and in a customer satisfaction survey carried out last year over 97 per cent of respondents rated the GSK medical information service as good or excellent.

In the majority of cases we have all the relevant information to address a particular medical enquiry and are able to provide a definitive and specific response. However, it is important to note that occasionally there are clinical situations where we do not have specific information because no published or internal data are available.

In these circumstances we provide as much clinical information as possible to assist our customers in making an informed clinical decision, but I recognise that a complete answer does not always exist.

Back to Top

Previous Topic (Medicines promotions)
Next Topic (Monitored dosage systems)
Send your letter to The Editor


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal