|
The Pharmaceutical
Journal Vol 267 No 7162 p274 |
|
Highlighting hazard |
Highlighting hazardI have long believed that pharmacists, who necessarily have to undergo training in the safe handling of potentially dangerous chemicals, are probably the only professionals in society who really appreciate how to deal with them. This means that when it comes to supplying chemicals to scientists and others who need them in their investigations, they stand in a class by themselves. They are not likely to be swayed by commercial considerations, the sort of thinking that leads to the three-for-the-price-of-two attitude that often makes a mockery of the supply of medicines to the public today. The awareness of politicians that any rash release of chemicals into the marketplace is bound to bring a critical reaction from the guardians of public safety has resulted in a greatly restricted availability of some materials deemed essential to science teaching and the private pursuance of research. This caution restricts pharmaceutical suppliers of chemicals as much as anyone else. I must admit that in my own college days we had a local pharmacy from which we were able to purchase most chemicals needed for analytical purposes, and were able to pursue our chemistry studies at home as well as in the college laboratory. The pharmacist in question was highly conscientious, and used to ask relevant questions to discover whether we knew precisely what we were doing, and what reactions we considered were involved. In those innocent days I cannot remember that we ever had any trouble in the way of fires, explosions or poisoning. But times have changed and anything more dangerous than sodium bicarbonate can rarely be bought from our local pharmacy. Lichenologists have long taken an interest in a
group of chemical tests to determine the presence of certain lichen constituents
relevant to identification. The reagents adopted include Admittedly, p-phenylenediamine comes into a more difficult category. I can remember when it was available from the Natural History Museum in London, failing other sources, but whether this still happens I do not know. This compound needs very careful handling, since it is a weak carcinogen and may cause nasty reactions if it makes contact with skin. It is applied in ethanolic solution, recently prepared, and care is essential to avoid spillage or drying out of the solution to produce a fine powder that may be inhaled. However, there is no lack of warnings to lichenologists who use it for diagnosis; the literature is full of them. Of course, as a pharmacist who has encountered much more hazardous compounds, I am not too complacent over the capability of biologists to use these reagents reasonably safely. Strange things sometimes occur in bio-laboratories that tend to raise the hair of a pharmacist. Nevertheless, I think a little more enlightenment of the makers of regulations is called for, in the interests of useful research. |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal