Home > PJ > News / Daily News

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 267 No 7164 p313-316
8 September 2001

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary


Record interventions as near misses, says CHI

Pharmacists’ prescribing interventions should be recorded as near miss medical errors, according to the Commission for Health Improvement.

The CHI report of a clinical governance review at North Glamorgan NHS Trust, comments on steps taken by the trust to review medication errors — drug incidents, as the CHI calls them. It says that pharmacist-monitoring of prescribing often results in changes being made before medicines are given to patients, but that these changes are not recorded in any structured way and are not considered to be near miss incidents.

“The trust needs to review how the important information from this intervention is aggregated and analysed so that learning can be spread across all clinical teams,” the report says. Dr Bryony Dean, director of the academic pharmacy unit at the Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, agrees that recording and monitoring pharmacy interventions is necessary as a learning exercise.

“Doctors really don’t seem to be very aware of the errors they have made,” she said. You can look at pharmacy interventions as a defence, she says, but it is a mistake to treat pharmacists as though they are infallible and to rely on them picking up doctors’ mistakes.

“Feedback to prescribers has got to be helpful in terms of raising error awareness. It’s a valuable opportunity to feed back and make all health professionals aware of the sort of things that go wrong and what can be done to prevent them,” she added.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal