Home > PJ  > Letters

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal Vol 267 No 7173 676-680
10 November 2001

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

Letters

  Naltrexone implants
  Medicines storage
  Supervision
  Primary care pharmacy
  The industry
  Community pharmacy
  Published research
  Pharmacy careers
  Pharmacy in Europe
  Onlooker
  Statutory Committee
  Council election
  The Society


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

 

Supervision

Are ETP and SOPs the answer?

From Dr J. A. Rees, MRPharmS

Helen Darracott (PJ, 20 October, p577) wants to reopen the debate on supervision and starts with "the profession needs to look at what the patient expects from pharmacy". John Wilson in an article (PJ, 13 October, p504) and letter (PJ, 27 October, p595) describes the patient as having a "fast food" mentality.

Perhaps the answer to supervision lies in the opportunity presented by the future implementation of electronic transfer of prescriptions (ETP), professional standards and training for dispensary staff by 2005 (PJ, 13 March 1999, p351) and standard operating procedures. These collectively could provide the possibility for "retraining" the "fast food mentality" patient and freeing time for the busy pharmacist.

Whichever system of ETP is implemented, it is the patient who requests the transfer. At the time of transfer, the patient could be informed that the prescription will be ready for collection at time "x" on day "y", ie, not within five minutes. The pharmacist would be required to perform the pharmaceutical checks on the prescription and dispensing, at times convenient to him or her, leaving the dispensing to trained staff working under an SOP. The pharmacist would need to be available at the predetermined collection time to provide patient advice or answer patient queries. Such a system would have the advantages of allowing dispensing and checking to be performed without the pressure from the "fast food" mentality patient, allow more planned work schedules for staff and allow the pharmacist to be involved in new services. However, it would require all community pharmacists to commit to a system of collection times.

Judith Rees
Altrincham,
Cheshire

Back to Top

Previous Topic (Medicines storage)
Next Topic (Primary care pharmacy)
Send your letter to The Editor


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal