|
The Pharmaceutical Journal |
|
Letters are available in a single PDF* file (90K) |
|
Community pharmacy
|
Patent expiriesHow should we manage changes?From Mr M. G. Hussain, MRPharmS I am writing with reference to your recent article "Is patent extension good for patients?" (PJ, 1 December 2001, p775). This was an excellent article which explained the complicated area of medical patents. I am currently in the process of producing a newsletter for GPs and pharmacists in the Leeds Health Authority area and would appreciate any input. In particular, I was looking at all the new formulations launched recently or likely to be marketed in the near future (Cardura XL, Diamicron XL, Xyzal, Neoclarityn, isomers of citalopram) and future patent expiries (Zocor) and how the practicalities can be managed in primary care. Should we change the patients to an alternative and then attempt to utilise any generics if and when they become available, or should we lock ourselves into a manufacturer's new product and in so doing remove the chance of future prescribing savings? There has also been great concern expressed by the health care community regarding the marketing of certain products, eg, Diamicron XL, a long-acting hypoglycaemic agent, on the grounds of patient safety, and the potential consequences of a dispensing error not to mention the cost implications. I look forward to reading the thoughts of fellow pharmacists, in particular on the practical issues of changing patients to new formulations and how best to manage this change in the best interests of both the NHS and patients. Mohammed Hussain |
|
|
Previous Topic (Medication errors) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal