|
The Pharmaceutical Journal |
|
News summary |
PGDs to be extended beyond the NHS
Patient group directions, which are currently restricted to health professionals working in the National Health Service, are to be extended to private, charitable and voluntary sector hospitals and to prisons, police custody suites and the defence medical services. Care homes are excluded from the proposed extension. Consultation letter MLX 278 (PDF* 45K), issued by the Medicines Control Agency on 9 January says that the criteria for PGDs in the new sectors will largely be the same as for NHS PGDs. The differences lie in the final authorising signatory for the body taking legal responsibility in each case. For prisons, this will be the prison governor (in England and Wales), the director of rehabilitation and care (Scotland) or director of services (Northern Ireland). In the case of police forces, the chief constable or a representative of the chief constable's office will have to sign. PGDs developed for use in the medical services of the three armed forces will need to be approved on behalf of the relevant single service medical director general or agency chief executive.
The proposal for final authorisation of PGDs in independent hospitals and clinics is that they should be signed off by the person registered as running the hospital under the Care Standards Act 2000 and the local manager registered under Regulations arising from the Act. If more than one person is registered, each will have sign the PGD. There is likely to be a separate consultation by the Home Office about a proposal to allow non-injectable Schedule 4 and 5 Controlled Drugs, with the exclusion of anabolic steroids, to be included in PGDs. It is also possible that specialist nurses working in accident and emergency departments and coronary care units will be allowed to use diamorphine under PGDs. The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs has agreed in principle to the changes, but the timescale has not been decided. In addition to views on the proposals, the MCA is seeking answers to four specific questions. They are: how should clinical governance operate in the independent sector; should external bodies, such as local prescribing committees be involved; how should pharmacist input be achieved if none are employed by the organisation; and how should microbiological advice be given in respect of antibiotics? Comments can be sent to Anne Ryan, 16-42, MCA, Market Towers, 1 Nine Elms Lane, London SW8 5NQ (e-mail ann.ryan@mca.gov.uk) until 10 April.
|
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal