|
The Pharmaceutical Journal |
|
Letters are available in a single PDF* file (80K) |
CPD
|
Monitored dosage systemsFull and proper paymentFrom Mr P. R. Rodwell, MRPharmS I read with interest that another multiple is to charge for the supply of monitored dosage systems (PJ, 9 March, p318), and I applaud the move. However I would like to ask the following: How did they arrive at the figure of £3 per patient per week? I ask this because at pharmacist locum rates (£20/hour) this equates to packing a one week MDS in nine minutes excluding any cost for equipment. Surely this still means the job is being done at a loss. Have the multiples in question simply come up with a figure to get the question of funding out into the open, or have they assumed minimum pharmacist input to the process? I do realise that packing of MDSs is a role suited to technicians, but we do need to keep in mind that not all pharmacies have such staff. If primary care trusts and others adopt the figure of £3 we may well find that not all pharmacies will be able to afford to offer an MDS service thereby leading to an inequity of service provision . If we are to take on roles and expect payment, I think we should argue for full and proper payment and not fall into the trap of doing someone else a favour again. Paul Rodwell |
|
|
Previous Topic (The Industry) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal