|
The Pharmaceutical Journal |
||
|
PDF* 65K |
|
Education
|
SupervisionHas anyone asked the public?From Mr A. C. Gush, MRPharmS In reply to Helen Remington (PJ, 20 April, p532) may I commend to her an article by Darrin Baines in Chemist & Druggist of 16 March. Dr Baines suggests that the profession's leaders have failed us because they have devalued the achievements of the past (rather than building upon them) en route to the future. Mrs Remington, while admitting only a limited understanding of community pharmacy, still feels qualified to lecture her community colleagues upon pharmacy mergers, service reconfiguration and skill mixing while apparently recognising no value in community pharmacy as it is currently practised in short, she has fallen into precisely the trap that Dr Baines describes. What is notable throughout is that she talks of professional aspirations not patients. Has anyone bothered to enquire whether pharmacies without pharmacists is what the public wants? Whither then community pharmacists' public health role? Is the true agenda one of patient focus or has this become obscured by professional arrogance and personal ambition? I am aware that the chief pharmaceutical officer for England is soon to publish a paper on the skill mix and supervision issue. For the sake of community pharmacists and the public, let us hope that he is talking to the people who actually provide the service in developing his ideas. Andrew Gush |
|
|
Previous Topic (Community
pharmacy) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal