Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7208 p133-134
27 July 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 55K

Letters

  The industry
  Cannabis
  Science in pharmacy
  ADR reporting
  Support staff
  Honorary auditors
  The Society
  Modernisation
  The Council


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Honorary auditors

A function well performed

From Mr A. G. M. Madge, FRPharmS

I must, especially as a former honorary auditor, commend Ian Caldwell on his comprehensive and erudite article on the problematic future of the modernisation process of the Society (PJ, 13 July, p81). It has the wisdom of our forebears who saw the necessity of control on finances and accountability to the membership. This function has been well performed by the honorary auditors over the years, especially with the power of inspection and "asking questions" to their satisfaction. The right of the membership to be eligible for election as honorary auditors was one of the basic principles of the pioneers of the Society.

The elected are drawn from all members irrespective of age, colour and creed. All sections make their contribution to the benefit of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and ultimate benefit of its members. Mr Caldwell rightly draws attention to the aspect of "establishment" gamekeepers turned poachers, various organisations without honorary auditors and few members attending annual general meetings, again portraying the responsibility of the honorary auditors.

Mervyn Madge
Plymouth

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Support staff)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal