Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7208 p133-134
27 July 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 55K

Letters

  The industry
  Cannabis
  Science in pharmacy
  ADR reporting
  Support staff
  Honorary auditors
  The Society
  Modernisation
  The Council


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

The Council

Corporate governance gone mad

From Mr M. Crane, MRPharmS

To give members of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council an option to sign the voluntary code of conduct and then to penalise Dr Gordon Appelbe and Sultan Dajani for choosing not to sign, by refusing them membership or chairmanship of certain committees, is discriminatory (PJ, 29 June, p929).

To state, as the President did, that "only two had not signed and the rest of the Council was not affected" does not lessen the fact that this is discrimination. Dr Appelbe, a former head of the Society's law department, a former secretary of the Statutory Committee, joint author of a standard work on pharmacy law and ethics and a former treasurer of the Society, now appears to be regarded by the Council as untrustworthy.

The voluntary code of conduct appears to resemble a Tudor loyalty oath to which one must subscribe or be punished. Is this corporate governance gone mad, or are we seeing the creation of a Committee of Unpharmaceutical Activities?

Malcolm Crane
Rye, East Sussex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Modernisation)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal