Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7210 p181
10 August 2002

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

 


Pharmacists to be allowed to copy or download patient information leaflets

The Medicines Control Agency wants pharmacists to be able to photocopy or reproduce patient information leaflets (PILs) without breaching copyright.
European rules require pharmaceutical products to be packaged with an approved PIL and United Kingdom legislation means that it is an offence to supply medicines without one. However, pharmacists’ terms of service often require packs to be split to meet the exact quantity prescribed, leaving residual packs which might not contain a leaflet.
In consultation letter MLX 285, issued on 1 August, the MCA says that one way around this would be for pharmacists to photocopy PILs or to download them from an approved website such as the Electronic Medicines Compendium (www.emc.vhn.net). The MCA is proposing that a new statutory defence against breach of copyright when leaflets are copied in this way should be established.
For community pharmacies, the Department of Health is proposing to make one-off payments of £500 to help meet the costs of gearing up to comply with the law and will be discussing with the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee whether there is a case for an ongoing addition to the global sum. The same arrangement would apply in Wales and Scotland.
Sue Sharpe, chief executive of the PSNC, told The Journal that the PSNC would be considering the adequacy and practicalities of the MCA’s proposals, bearing in mind that some PILs were many pages long. Mrs Sharpe added: “We support the move towards recognition of the need to find solutions to the present, entirely unsatisfactory position, and will discuss the proposals with the pharmaceutical industry and other bodies to see how they might contribute to a sensible solution.”
The Department of Health is also to consider the possibility of allowing flexibility for pharmacists to dispense products in packs of 28 (or multiples) when packs of 30 are prescribed, and vice versa. The Department says that it is following what is happening in Scotland. Frank Owens, chairman of the Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council, said: “Since last summer, Scottish contractors have been able to round up or down to the nearest whole pack where a product is identified as being in a patient pack.” He added that the SPGC was talking with the Scottish Executive Health Department about the introduction of a comprehensive patient pack programme in the near future. Mr Owens said that the MCA’s photocopying proposal was completely impractical and would take pharmacists away from front-line patient care.
In a question and answer document to accompany MLX 285, the MCA notes that all other European Union countries have systems that use whole patient packs, with the UK being unique in its need to split packs or dispense from bulk. Moving to using patient packs would “add to NHS costs without producing any benefit to patients”, it says. The MCA says that the principal cost to pharmacists would be the time taken copying leaflets. It assumes that existing equipment would be used.
Comments on the proposal should be sent to Amanda Lawrence, Medicines Control Agency, Room 14-152, Market Towers, 1 Nine Elms Lane, London SW8 5NQ (tel 020 7273 0366) by 24 October.
Comment, p180

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal