Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7211 p215-218
17 August 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 70K

Letters

  Pharmacy in Wales
  Pharmacy practice
  Pharmacy salaries
  Artichokes
  Tablet crushing
  Patient information
  Modernisation
  The Society
  The Journal


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

The Journal

A pathetic response to the survey

From Mr C. L. Flint, MRPharmS

In your editorial of 29 June (p894), you urged "all members to consider the issues and make their views known by filling in the questionnaire either on paper or online", adding the words "whatever members' views, the changes facing the profession at this time are as great as any in its history".

In your editorial of 3 August (p146), you report that "about 4 per cent of members of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society responded to the survey. ... By the end of last week [ ie, 27 July, four weeks later] 1,760 completed surveys had been returned out of a total membership of 44,000."

You go on to say: "It is a good response in market research terms. Only for surveys where there is a financial reward for filling them in or a direct benefit to an individual would responses be expected to be in excess of 5 per cent."

The difference between 4 and 5 per cent would amount to another 440 pharmacists expressing concern about the future of the profession. There is but one word to express this situation — pathetic.

It will be too late to react when a member of the Government or the establishment switches off the lights on leaving the room — alone.

C. L. Flint
Alton, Hampshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal