| The Pharmaceutical Journal |
||
|
PDF 60K |
|
Controlled drugs
|
Workforce censusUpset at being profiled by ethnic originFrom Mr A. C. Patel, MRPharmS I take offence at receiving your enclosed "Pharmacy Workforce Census" 2002, which I refuse to complete on the grounds that the Society is trying to sort me out by my ethnic origin, especially since it is not an anonymous survey. I am wondering what a learned Society like ours is trying to do with this information. One of the reasons forwarded in The Journal, implementing race relations legislation (PJ, 14 September, p378), does not hold water — the Society is not the Government. Would the practice research division care to elaborate? As a member of an ethnic minority I have access to an abundance of Race Relations Acts and Laws — we do not need any more legislation. As a member of the Society I have several questions: (1) Who would have access to the results of this census and in what form? (2) How does the Society plan on protecting this data? (3) Where would this data be stored and in what format? (4) Does the Society under the Data Protection Act have to make the Data Protection Agency aware that it is conducting such a survey? Another question that comes to my mind is how the ethnic origin survey of pharmacists is going to help plan the future of the pharmacy profession? I think it is important to focus on enhancing the image and the morale of the Society and its membership. I feel extremely upset at the thought that I am being profiled by my ethnic origin. I am currently seeking legal advice as to whether the Society can conduct surveys/census that are based on racial/ethnic profiling of its membership under the Race Relations Act since the profiling does not enhance, benefit or further contribute to the learnedness of the membership. Ashok Patel
|
|||
|
Send your letter to The Editor |
Previous Topic (The Council) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal