Home > PJ (Current issue) > Meetings and Conferences | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7220 p583
19 October 2002

This article
Reprint
Photocopy

     

Meetings and Conferences

Monash Pharmacy Practice Symposium

New approaches to teaching and learning

“Experiential teaching and learning in pharmacy” was the theme of the inaugural Monash Pharmacy Practice Symposium held in Prato, Italy, on 9 and 10 September. The symposium was hosted by Monash University, Victoria, Australia. Paul Rutter, senior lecturer, pharmacy practice division, Portsmouth University, reports

The need for more pharmacists in many countries has resulted in new schools of pharmacy being opened and new ways of teaching and learning being considered.
Professor Mariette Lowes, dean of the faculty of health sciences, Technikon Pretoria, South Africa, described how innovative teaching methods were embedded into the curriculum of a new school of pharmacy which opened in 1999 at the university. Initially, learning outcomes and competency standards were identified which were needed to produce competent practitioners. The curriculum was developed using horizontal integration and taught primarily on a body systems approach. The teaching approach followed an outcomes based approach to education and was solely taught by problem-based learning (PBL).

Professor Lowes went on to explain how PBL works and what steps are involved in this new approach. Students work in small groups, usually of six or eight people, and meet twice a week. At the first meeting students are presented with a scenario, from which they have to identify the problem and decide what information has to be sought and who should do what. Later in the same week the students come together again to assimilate the information and feedback their findings to others. No formal didactic lectures are part of the learning process, although students can request lectures when they feel more information on a topic is required. At the meetings, a facilitator is on hand to help but not intervene in the process. Self-motivation and self-directed learning are key attributes that students must have or gain during PBL.

Professor Lowes was asked about how students acquired such skills. She replied that all students undertake a life skills programme, which covers such topics.

Using case-based learning and clinical teaching
Associate Professor John Rovers, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, United States, spoke about the value of case-based learning to clinical teaching. Case-based learning, like PBL, addresses higher levels of cognitive skills, ie, students are able to apply knowledge. He highlighted three types of cases: trigger, focused and integrative. Trigger cases were described as a simple descriptive account of an event, intended to invoke the student to follow some course of action, yet allowing for a variety of problems to be considered. The example of a patient presenting at a community pharmacist asking for something for constipation was highlighted as a trigger case. This type of case teaches data collection and assessment but does not require identification or resolution of the problem.
The focused case does not require exploration of multiple issues or problems but is directed toward a specific pharmacist act. For example, in the constipation scenario, the case would change from a trigger case to a focused case if the pharmacist had decided the problem was constipation and had to recommended a particular type of laxative. Focused cases are, therefore, intended to try to get the student to develop patient care plans.
The integrative case is the most complex type. It presents the student with multiple problems and requires the student to prioritise information. At Drake University, Professor Rovers said this type of teaching is used to teach therapeutics while the student is at the university and on practice-based placements.

Experiential teaching — theory to practice
Dawn Best, postgraduate medical education co-ordinator, Western Health, Australia, challenged participants to think of reasons why experiential learning should be included in curricula. She outlined the different educational theories underpinning experiential teaching and how these theories can be applied to pharmacy education. Fundamentally, anything that is active, other than note taking, could be classed as experiential learning, eg, practical classes, role play, PBL, case-based learning and work placements. A key to successful experiential learning is how active the learning is and how involved the students are. Is it relevant to the student perception of real world practice and how much autonomy do they have on setting the learning objectives?
In addressing student perception of real life practice, Dr Jennifer Marriott, lecturer in clinical pharmacy, Monash University, Australia, described a case-based authentic assessment of clinical pharmacy students. Students were provided with case studies of real patients to which a series of clinical scenarios were added. Students were then required to assess the new clinical situation taking into consideration individual patient factors and to determine appropriate treatment. Each student, therefore, had an individualised patient scenario unique to them, thus negating plagiarism.
Professor Jo-anne Brien, department of clinical pharmacy, University of Sydney, Australia, outlined how theory had been put into practice. The pharmacy course had been extended from three to four years in Australia in 1997 and this had provided the opportunity to introduce experiential programmes to the undergraduate curriculum. Two such examples, at Monash and Sydney universities, were briefly explained. Both programmes have fundamentally the same aims but are administered in different ways to accommodate the different curricula structures.
Meeting all parties’ expectations and logistics of placements were highlighted as two key personal learning objectives about implementing such schemes.
Rohan Elliott, preceptor co-ordinator, Austin and Repatrition Medical Centre, Australia, described in more detail how the Monash experiential programme operated. Students attend a designated hospital in both their third and fourth years. A minimum of nine weeks’ practical experience is obtained. The work involved in the third year is introductory and the fourth year advanced. The advanced practical experience was presented and detailed what training elements were covered.
Students are assigned a ward-based tutor and given initial training in the clinical tasks they are expected to perform. In time, students are expected to perform these tasks on their own, including any background reading or research required to undertake the role. Periodically, tutorials are run for all students at the hospital to cover the generic skills needed, eg, how to take a patient’s history.
Positive outcomes from the programme have shown that recruitment into the hospital sector has dramatically improved and anecdotal evidence suggests that graduates have much better clinical task performance skills than previous cohorts.


  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal