Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7221 p605-608
26 October 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF 68K

Letters

  Supervision
  Sociology
  Advertising
  Media
  CPD
  Materia Medica
  The profession
  Herbal medicines
  Patient packs


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

The profession

Dispensary is not a “comfort zone”

From Mr D. L. Coleman, FRPharmS

In the PJ (5 October, p499) Helen Darracott, head of professional standards at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, talks about “challenging the comfort zone of the dispensary”.

Now I have experienced many emotions in the dispensary but never have regarded it as a “comfort zone”. The more apt descriptions seem to be “frantic”, “pressurised”, “a treadmill” or “a slave to time” and even on some occasions not far short of a “battlefield”. Few of us, I imagine, can manage to supervise methadone consumption, to check prescriptions, to deal with a telephone query and advise a patient all at the same time and I do not believe any of us would call such an experience a visit to a “comfort zone”. I acknowledge, too, the invaluable work of technicians and the pressure they are often exposed to is, at times, almost unacceptable.

Some might describe extended role practice as approaching a comfort zone. Certainly I find discussing the medication of a patient with a general practitioner or talking to a patient group or health authority much less stressful, simply because I can concentrate on one thing at a time.

Mrs Darracott also says that the Code of Ethics has not required a final check for some years. This is true, but her department has recently written to a major multiple asking it to insist that all pharmacists initial the label on the dispensed medicine. That surely is “the final check approach” or is she seriously suggesting that the label be initialled before the prescription is assembled or completed?

David Coleman
North Walsham, Norfolk

 

 

Stephen Lutener, head of professional conduct, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, replies:

There may be some confusion about the meaning of comments made by Professional Standards Directorate when advising pharmacists about dispensing procedures.

We do, indeed, refer to a “final check” in our letters, but these are accuracy checks which may be carried out by any suitably trained member of staff. The check which only a pharmacist should carry out is the clinical or professional check.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Materia Medica)
Next Topic (Herbal medicines)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal