Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7221 p605-608
26 October 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF 68K

Letters

  Supervision
  Sociology
  Advertising
  Media
  CPD
  Materia Medica
  The profession
  Herbal medicines
  Patient packs


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Patient packs

Patient packs are not working

From Mrs J. H. Brown, MRPharmS

I applaud Stuart Courtney’s letter (PJ, 12 October, p523) regarding patient packs. How big does a 28-pack of omeprazole have to be?

We were told that patient packs would eliminate transfer between packs and be more convenient and informative for the patient. This is not working because the standard unit for the majority of packs cannot be agreed, an argument which has been rumbling for most of my professional life of 36 years.

Patients transfer medicines from strips to other containers because of storage problems, information leaflets cause non-compliance because of daunting lists of side effects and the standard of some parallel imports leaves a lot to be desired.

Bulk packs are convenient, easily stored, do not overuse precious resources or generate enormous quantities of waste.

Information leaflets, provided by manufacturers, could be issued on request with counselling by the pharmacist at time of issue. Labels could be printed in bold type.

However, this is not going to happen since we are too far down the road to Europe. We will continue to suffer profound irritation and cut fingers because, although those people in their ivory towers would have us believe that our roles have changed, for the vast majority of us, dispensing is what we do and will continue to do for the foreseeable future.

Jean Brown
Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne and Wear

 

Imagine if . . .

From Mr G. A. Fox, MRPharmS

The check-out girl said I was crazy and called for the supermarket manager. I explained that since the botch ups on bovine spongiform encephalopathy and foot and mouth by the Ministry for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries the Government has decided to have the highly efficient National Health Service machinery take over food distribution through the Department of Health.

From now on I explained, his store would have to supply exactly the quantities of food I demanded.

“I haven’t heard anything about that,” he insisted.

Anyway, I showed him my shopping list.

“Looks a bit like a doctor’s prescription,” he said.

As he read the items his frown deepened.

“You are crazy! You can’t expect me to open a pack of biscuits, take 100g of butter out of a pack or sell you 300ml of Coca-Cola from a litre pack.”

“Why not?,” I replied. “We do it all the time with medicines, by law, and that is much more hazardous than food. I want 20 plain chocolate covered digestive biscuits.”

“You can have a pack of 16 or 26,” he replied.

“No, I insist on 20.”

“How do you expect me to give you 20?”

“Open one pack of 26 and take six out.”

“What will I do with the rest?”

“Sell them to your next customer.”

“How can I possibly sell six unpacked, unmarked, undated biscuits?”

“Easy, the DoH will give you a photocopier to copy the wrapper.”

At this point I noticed his eyes signalling between me and a rather burly security guard.

“You pharmacists must be mad!”

“Oh yes, we are . . . and we are getting madder every day.”

Gerald Fox
Herington Pharmacy, Dunstable



 


 

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Herbal medicines)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal