Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7223 p676
9 November 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF 55K

Letters

  Academic pharmacists
  Patient packs
  Community pharmacists
  Antibiotics
  The Society
  CPD
  The Journal


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

The Society

We are puzzled

From Dr P. Bissell and Dr C. W. Anderson, MRPharmS

We have found the furore surrounding the collection of data relating to ethnicity in the pharmacy workforce census somewhat surprising and are writing in support of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society in conducting the census.

Debate about the collection of data on ethnic origin dates back to the 1970s and 1980s when it was suggested that questions on ethnic origin should be collected in the 10-yearly national census. At the time, some feared that collecting data on ethnic origin might be used by racist agencies to discriminate against minority ethnic groups. The notion that local and national agencies cannot act against discrimination unless they know they extent of it — thus requiring the collection of such data — is now widely accepted in most areas of public life. That is not to suggest that forms of discrimination on grounds of race, colour or ethnicity are a thing of the past, but that basic data are needed in order to track this.

Our sense is that the Society is attempting to look at different career patterns and working conditions experienced by different ethnic groups. This seems to be a highly laudable aim and we are puzzled and saddened by the difficulties some pharmacists seem to have with this.

Paul Bissell
Claire Anderson
Pharmacy School,
University of Nottingham

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Antibiotics)
Next Topic (Continuing professional development)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal