Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7225 p743
23 November 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 75K

Letters

  Public health
  Community pharmacy
  Pharmacy practice
  Drug tariff
  ADR reporting
  Parkinson's disease
  Anticholinesterases
  Medicines distribution
  Patient information
  Training
  CPD
  Onlooker


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

ADR reporting

Certainty is not necessary

From Mr C. Anton

Louise Hughes and colleagues (PDF 70K) deserve praise for researching into the poorly understood area of recognising symptoms or adverse drug reactions (PJ, 16 November, p719). However, there was one important omission in the paper. The Committee on Safety of Medicines now asks that all drugs used in children should be treated as "black triangle" drugs and all suspected adverse reactions should be reported.

Therefore, I would add to their useful advice to community pharmacists that they should encourage parents to inform them of any ADRs experienced by their children.

It was also interesting to read some of the comments, particularly the pharmacist who began "We must make sure ...". The CSM does not require certainty before reporting only a suspicion. So pharmacists should use their clinical judgement and experience to decide the facts, but they should not be put off reporting because they cannot be sure.

Christopher Anton
Administrative Co-ordinator,
West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting,
City Hospital,
Birmingham

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Drug tariff)
Next Topic (Parkinson's disease)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal