Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7227 p811
7 December 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 70K

Letters

  Locum pharmacy
  Multiple pharmacies
  Public health
  Education
  Rural pharmacists
  CPD
  Zyprexia
  Food-drug interactions
  Drug tariff
  Community pharmacy
  The Profession


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

CPD

A Society of dispensing pharmacists?

From Mr B. W. Knox, MRPharmS

I agree with Susan Macdonald (PJ, 16 November p712). I pay my Royal Pharmaceutical Society retention fee but, although I use my knowledge of pharmacy daily in my work, it is not necessary for me to be a member. There must be many other pharmacists in a similar position to myself. If, or when, we all resign, we will be left with a Society of National Health Service dispensing pharmacists.

Is that what is wanted? Is that a good thing for the future of pharmacy? Should the Society be no longer seen as one which embraces all aspects of pharmacy? Does the Society care about this issue? Or is it going to sleep-walk into rejecting anyone who does not dispense? How about an answer on this issue.

Brian W. Knox
Harrogate

 

Dr PETER WILSON, consultant on continuing professional development, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, replies:

A number of correspondents who have expressed concerns about participation in continuing professional development have made the assumption that CPD must focus on practice in community or hospital pharmacy. This is not the case. For any pharmacist participating in CPD, the focus should be on the work that they do. For community pharmacists, the majority of their CPD would relate to community pharmacy practice. For industrial pharmacists, CPD would focus on their work in industry, eg, production, formulation, quality assurance, etc. We know from the CPD pilots that for most pharmacist, CPD will bring little change in the nature and extent of their learning activities. The major change is keeping records of CPD. In the pilots, most pharmacists spent about 30 minutes each month on record keeping.

The detailed requirements for pharmacists’ participation in CPD are not yet defined. Assuredly though, it is not the intention of the Society that introduction of CPD will lead to committed pharmacists relinquishing their membership.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Rural pharmacists)
Next Topic (Zyprexia)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal