Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 270 No 7232 p83
18 January 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 80K

Letters

  Period-of-treatment fee
  Community pharmacy
  Locum pharmacy
  Hospital pharmacy
  PILs
  ReQuip
  The Profession
  Women's health
  CPD
  Scottish Executive
  The Society
  Registration exam
  Supervision
  The Register
  Christmas miscellany


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Supervision

Pharmacists are uniquely qualified to supervise a pharmacy

From Ms E. M. O’Shea, MRPharmS

Modernisation, modernisation. That is a word I hear a lot these days in relation to the National Health Service consultants' new contracts, the Fire Brigade's Union and indeed our own profession.

I realise that each profession is under enormous pressure from Whitehall to shape-up or ship-out — I am all for it. I have no desire to be tied to the dispensary bench for my entire career. I will gladly embrace the roles of pharmacist prescriber or medicines manager as they emerge. However, I believe that in accepting these roles I cannot, and should not, sacrifice my legal, moral and ethical right and responsibility to supervise a pharmacy. This is a role for which I am uniquely qualified.

The technology that may allow a pharmacist to be accountable for one pharmacy on any given day without actually being present would surely work in reverse and allow the pharmacist who is supervising to perform other duties without leaving the building. Why else are we working towards electronic prescribing and other initiatives?

Eithne O'Shea
Birmingham

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Registration exam)
Next Topic (The Register)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal