Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 270 No 7237 p266
22 February 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 85K

Letters

  OFT report
  Supermarket pharmacy
  CPD
  Repeat prescribing
  Community pharmacy
  Locum pharmacy
  Dispensing
  YPG project
  The Profession
  Diabetes
  The Society
  Homoeopathy
  Paediatric pharmacy


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Repeat prescribing

Illegibility of prescriptions

From Mr P. F. Pavey, MRPharmS

I agree with Walter Fisher (PJ, 15 February, p230) about illegibility of computer-printed prescriptions. I have recently contacted the author of a newsletter circulated to practices in our local health authority hoping that this issue might be raised since, besides irritation to ourselves, there are cost and clinical governance issues to be considered.

The patient (who may be elderly and have poorer eyesight than we do) might have to request items from the list printed on the repeat portion of the FP10 — a great risk of errors here. Only last week I had an incident where a patient was expecting beclometasone inhalers but had a prescription issued for beclometasone nasal spray. Both items were on the repeat list.

This type of incident can lead to wastage and delays in getting the correct medication. Inkjet printers and larger type faces are the solution. Let your local surgery know if you believe you have a problem.

Patrick Pavey
Romsey, Hampshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (CPD)
Next Topic (Community pharmacy)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal