Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 270 No 7238 p302
1 March 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 90K

Letters

  OFT report
  Corporate pharmacy
  Supermarket pharmacy
  CPD
  Chloroform water
  Antipsychotics
  Advertising
  Pharmacist prescribing
  Dentistry
  APPG
  The Register
  Dispensing
  The Profession
  Leadership
  The Council
  The Society


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Advertising

Drug advertising continues to mislead

From Mr P. Burrill, MRPharmS

As Anthony Cox rightly says (PJ, 1 February, p154), Trevor Jones protests too much. Anyone who wants some more insight into how selectively the pharmaceutical industry supports evidence-based medicine should read Jeanne Lenzer's article in the BMJ.1

In the recent landmark study ALLHAT,2 a thiazide diuretic chlortalidone was shown to be superior to amlodipine in preventing heart failure, overall and for hospitalised or fatal cases, and superior to lisinopril on several endpoints.

However, the new advertisement for amlodipine states: "ALL HATs off to Istin. With the results of the ALLHAT study, lowering blood pressure with Istin in high risk hypertensive patients is now proven to be equivalent to a diuretic in stroke outcome. It's Istin isn't it."

Not an untruth, but highly selective reporting. They neglected to add "but if you use amlodipine (Istin) first line instead of a thiazide, one out of 61 patients so treated would be admitted to hospital or die as a result of heart failure".

The truth is out there.

References

1. Lenzer J. Spin doctors soft pedal data on antihypertensives. BMJ 2003;326:170.

2. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomised to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 2002;288:2981–97.

Peter Burrill
Specialist in Pharmaceutical Public Health
North Derbyshire Public Health Network

 

Dr KATE LLOYD, medical director, Pfizer Ltd, replies:

Mr Burrill accuses Pfizer of misleading and selective reporting in an advertisement concerning the ALLHAT trial. We strongly refute these allegations.

Amlodipine (Istin) in the United Kingdom is licensed for hypertension and is generally prescribed as add-on treatment to other antihypertensive medication.

Hypertension is a well-recognised surrogate for stroke but perhaps less well accepted as a surrogate for generalised cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It may therefore be considered inappropriate to talk about any outcomes other than stroke in conjunction with amlodipine's effect in lowering blood pressure.

Mr Burril focuses on the heart failure data. In ALLHAT, heart failure was not a primary or secondary endpoint in its own right, but was part of a composite of "combined cardiovascular disease". There was no statistically significant difference between amlodipine and diuretic for this endpoint. In addition, there was no significant difference between amlodipine and diuretic in deaths due to heart failure.

The assertion, that placing patients on amlodipine therapy instead of a thiazide diuretic costs lives, is thus unfounded. As noted above, in this clinical trial, much as in United Kingdom clinical practice, approximately two-thirds of patients will be on combination medication rather than monotherapy to achieve blood pressure control to target.

A recent editorial in the BMJ1 has reviewed the ALLHAT results. Pfizer's conclusions from the ALLHAT trial appear to be in line with the views of the editorial, which also comments: This finding [increased incidence of heart failure in the ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker arms of ALLHAT] must be viewed with caution. It is not surprising that patients randomised to diuretic got less oedema than those randomised to ACE inhibitor or calcium channel blocker."

It is for these reasons that we believe that our advertising represents a fair balance of the clinical outcomes of the ALLHAT study that we can discuss in the context of amlodipine promotion. Amlodipine, when used within its licence and according to its clinical data is a valuable drug in the treatment of hypertension.

Reference

1. Williams B. Drug treatment of hypertension. BMJ 2003; 326:61–62.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Antipsychotics)
Next Topic (Pharmacist prescribing)

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal