| The Pharmaceutical Journal |
||
|
PDF* 90K |
|
OFT report
|
AdvertisingDrug advertising continues to misleadFrom Mr P. Burrill, MRPharmS As Anthony Cox rightly says (PJ, 1 February, p154), Trevor Jones protests too much. Anyone who wants some more insight into how selectively the pharmaceutical industry supports evidence-based medicine should read Jeanne Lenzer's article in the BMJ.1 In the recent landmark study ALLHAT,2 a thiazide diuretic chlortalidone was shown to be superior to amlodipine in preventing heart failure, overall and for hospitalised or fatal cases, and superior to lisinopril on several endpoints. However, the new advertisement for amlodipine states: "ALL HATs off to Istin. With the results of the ALLHAT study, lowering blood pressure with Istin in high risk hypertensive patients is now proven to be equivalent to a diuretic in stroke outcome. It's Istin isn't it." Not an untruth, but highly selective reporting. They neglected to add "but if you use amlodipine (Istin) first line instead of a thiazide, one out of 61 patients so treated would be admitted to hospital or die as a result of heart failure". The truth is out there.
Peter Burrill
|
|||||
|
Send your letter to The Editor |
Previous Topic (Antipsychotics) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us