| The Pharmaceutical Journal |
||
|
PDF* 75K |
|
OFT report
|
CPDFlawed data collectionFrom Mr G. K. Benton, FRPharmS The Royal Pharmaceutical Society's continuing professional development survey is an example of the lowering of standards in statistics. It opens with a premise and affords no option to find that premise unacceptable. For the results to have any credibility, the first question must be whether or not there should be mandatory CPD. Only then can the validity of the remainder of the answers be tested. It is an appalling example of flawed data collection and as such is not worthy of a learned society. Gerald Benton
Innocent until proven guiltyFrom Dr W. J. Pugh, MRPharmS I write in connection with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's proposed mandatory continuing professional development. Does the Society have the power to bar a pharmacist from practising unless it can show good cause in the case of that individual? If so it would seem to be a reversal of the fundamental tenet of English law that one is innocent until proven guilty. Is the latter superior law? It certainly seems superior justice. W. John Pugh |
|||||
|
Send your letter to The Editor |
Previous Topic (Marketing) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us