Houses and homes
There is a great deal of difference between a house and a home, and it never fails to irritate
me when I see an advertisement offering "luxury homes for sale". You can buy a house, but never
a home, which is the house plus all the human factors that go with it. The sooner we correct
this misrepresentation the better.
Some of the results of a change in our social habits as reflected in the demand for more and
more individual residences are discussed by an Oslo economist, Nico Keilman, in Nature for
30 January. As he remarks, households in many countries have become smaller in recent decades.
Twenty years ago it was usual for a family to continue to inhabit the parental house until the
younger members married and set up a new establishment. Now it has since become the rule for
children to set up new abodes, sometimes even before leaving school or college, so that even
relatively spacious houses become the abode of a pair of ageing parents, their children having
moved to small flats or bungalows. Thus, while the world's population has increased, so has the
proportion of small households.
These changes, reinforcing each other, mean that the demand for food, water, arable land, energy,
transport facilities and energy sources, in both less and more developed countries, has increased.
Even if a local population remains constant, household members no longer share their space, furnishings,
energy and transport demands, which causes these to demand more of them. Small households are
less energy efficient than larger ones and also multiply.
As Keilman remarks, "social, economic and cultural theories of demographic behaviour point
to a variety of reasons why individuals prefer to live in small households". They include relaxation
of strict social norms, less "religiosity" and increased individual freedom in ethical matters,
more insistence on and acceptance of symmetrical gender roles, including access to education
and employment, increased economic aspirations and more freedom in residential decisions.
Population ageing has an important effect on the overall picture. Increased longevity means
that there are longer periods when children do not live with their parents, and the greater mortality
of men and the age difference between spouses result in more widows having to live alone, usually
in smaller houses. As a group of researchers in the United States argue in a letter published
in the same issue of Nature, the change in living habits must exert a significant adverse
effect on biodiversity conservation measures and increase the challenge to those bodies responsible
for it.
Back to Top
|