| The Pharmaceutical Journal |
||
|
PDF* 85K |
|
Modernisation
|
Drug tariffBroken bulk rules require reviewFrom Mr C. E. H. Thimbleby, MRPharmS An excerpt from my local primary care trust's newsletter "a reminder to community pharmacists that dressings are listed singly in the Drug Tariff so can be supplied as such when required. Some reluctance continues to be shown in this area ...". The exclusion of dressings (Part 9A of the Drug Tariff) from the broken bulk rules may have been acceptable 15 years ago when the wound management list consisted of a few gauze swabs and a crepe bandage but a scan through this month's Tariff at the basic price of modern dressings makes for frightening reading. For example, five Mepitel dressings 20 x 30cm cost £72.30. You can image my "reluctance" in dispensing a prescription last week something I am contractually obliged to do for one of these dressings. The reduced dispensing fee I receive for this prescription also added to my cheery demeanour. The remainder of this pack is now sitting with my other dead dressings stock (an item's popularity does not long survive a visit from the medical representative to the practice/district nurse). Although I appreciate the need for the PCT to adhere to its budget, is it the job of the community pharmacy to prop up the NHS in this way? It is high time the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee took this matter up with the Department of Health. If they are unwilling to amend the rules, perhaps consideration should be given to stipulating that dressings must be supplied by the manufacturer in singles in order to remain in the Tariff. This would undoubtedly reduce overuse, wastage and costs. The profession would also be left with more cash to spend on other NHS subsidies, like deliveries, advice and monitored dosage systems. Christian Thimbleby
|
|||
|
Send your letter to The Editor |
Previous Topic (The Charter) |
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us