Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7261 p167
9 August 2003

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
Evaluation of the Pharmacy First Service (PDF 390K)


Derby scheme repeats success for pharmacy referrals for minor ailments

Pharmacy First, a scheme in Derby for referring patients with minor ailments to see a pharmacist rather than a general practitioner, saved around 500 GP consultations a month. The scheme is the latest to demonstrate the benefits for patients and GPs of such services and comes as the merits of incorporating a national scheme in the new pharmacy contract are being debated.

Under the Central Derby Primary Care Trust scheme, patients from six inner-city GP practices could be referred by a receptionist to one of 11 pharmacies. The practices are in some of the most deprived areas of the city. As part of the referral, each patient was given a booklet listing the non-prescription medicines available under the scheme. If the patient visited a participating pharmacy, the pharmacist made a record in the book of any medicines prescribed. Medicines were given free of charge to patients exempt from National Health Service prescription charges. Pharmacies taking part in the scheme were paid an annual retainer of £50 and a consultation fee of £2.50 per patient visit. Medicines were reimbursed at Drug Tariff prices.

During a six-month audit in the second half of 2002, there were 3,686 referrals made. The average cost of medicines supplied for each referral was 75p. Adding pharmacy fees and PCT administration costs, the total cost was £11,982 or £3.51 per referral. No estimate was made of the costs of the community pharmacists’ time in carrying out the service.

Lisa Flint and Dr Peter Rivers of Research and Evaluation Services, University of Derby, analysed the scheme and say that pharmacists, GPs and patients all appreciated the service. They recommend that it should be extended to other practices and pharmacies. Some of the areas for development identified include extending the formulary of medicines and reducing the amount of paperwork associated with the scheme. Concerns were expressed by pharmacists and their staff that they felt under pressure to prescribe medicines to all patients referred to them and that some patients had used the scheme to get medicines even though they were not entitled to do so.

At the same time, the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee is continuing to press for a similar scheme to be included as part of the new national pharmacy contract. The PSNC wants this to be one of the core, or essential, parts of the contract. The Department of Health currently favours making such a scheme an additional service that PCTs can choose to implement locally if desired. The Department is understood to be concerned about the cost implications of any nationally promoted scheme.

Alistair Buxton, head of NHS services at the PSNC, told The Journal: “All the schemes similar to the one in Derby that we are aware of have not increased the cost of prescribing medicines.”

In Scotland, it has been agreed in principle to make a minor ailments scheme a core part of the new community pharmacy contract (see p165).


  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal