Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7262 p204
16 August 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 75K

Letters

  Sign language
  Tablet crushing
  CPD
  Community pharmacy
  Junk mail
  Packaging
  Prescribing
  The Society


Letters to the Editor

CPD

Pensioners below the poverty line

From Mr A. R. Korsner, MRPharmS

I endorse what Andy Pothecary writes in his letter (PJ, 9 August, p175). I wonder also whether the powers-that-be have considered the extreme hardship that could potentially befall pharmacists reaching retirement age in the near future. In recent conversations with such pharmacists, it appears that many have factored into their retirement plans their ability to do the odd locum to supplement their pensions.

Unlike doctors and other health care professionals, more than 30 years of working in the National Health Service has gained pharmacists nothing in terms of an NHS pension. Most (especially employee pharmacists without the sale of a business as a financial cushion), through no fault of their own, will now face the possibility of falling into a poverty trap with this movement of the goal posts.

I for one do not relish seeing my professional colleagues in this position. Having worked a lifetime as unsung, unrecognised heroes of the NHS, we now face the ignominy of retirement on a shoestring, tending our daffodils, while our doctor friends whistle around the world spending their superannuation.

There has to be a way of registering semi-retired pharmacists so that they can work and carry out certain tasks of a non-clinical nature without the necessity to fulfil the full continuing professional development requirements. With all due respect to the excellent academic achievements of recently qualified pharmacists, there is nothing that can be taught at university that can supplement the experience and confidence of a lifetime of work.

Is our Society prepared to sit back and witness the possibility of ex-pharmacists moving, in desperation, to “health food stores”, advising and giving credibility to these ungoverned organisations?

If the Society is hell bent on this level of compulsory CPD then it needs to give much more thought to the needs of those pharmacists for whom the income from a little work is essential to keep both body and mind together.

It must also boost up and publicise the Benevolent Fund to take into account the considerable extra numbers who may, sadly, need to avail themselves of it.

There is currently great, unspoken, fear and uncertainty at grass roots.

Adrian Korsner
London N20

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Tablet crushing)
Next Topic (Community pharmacy)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal