Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 271 No 7268 p404
27 September 2003

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 100K

Letters

  Consultants
  Fluoridation
  CPD
  The Society
  Modernisation
  Workforce census


Letters to the Editor

Consultants

Consistent approach to consultant roles

From Mr D. G. Webb, MRPharmS, and others

We welcome the contribution by Brian Hebron and colleagues (PJ, 30 August, p261) to the debate on consultant roles for pharmacists. The authors suggest that the title should apply to a cadre of exceptional individuals and, in support of this, we have made the case previously for the staged development of practitioners based on competency progression.1 Since 2002, we have been working with pharmacy managers, primary care trust leads, regional pharmacy specialists and academic colleagues in London and South East on a strategy that seeks to recognise three distinct tiers of practice: general, advanced and consultant. A key element of this strategy has been the design and validation of two competency frameworks that can be applied at the general and advanced-to-consultant levels respectively.

The General Level Framework2 has been subject to a 12-month controlled evaluation among 104 junior grade pharmacists in 21 NHS trusts in London and the South East. Interim and final analyses have shown benefits in terms of the framework’s impact on clinical practice and our initial findings were presented as a poster at the British Pharmaceutical Conference in Harrogate.3 At last year’s event in Manchester, we delivered a session on “clinical directorships, consultant pharmacists and clinical competencies” and this prompted dialogue with the Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists, the United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association and various specialist interest groups (including non-clinical pharmacy specialties) that subsequently has facilitated work on the advanced and consultant levels of the practitioner development strategy.

Based on a review of the literature and consensus panel discussions, an advanced practice competency framework has now been produced. In addition to the four functions described by Hebron and colleagues, this framework recognises two further competency clusters. In total, these are: expert professional practice; building working relationships; leadership; management; education, training and development; and research and evaluation. To date, we have invited selected clinical pharmacy specialists to assess whether high-level practitioners can map their own practice on to the domains of the framework and to indicate what evidence might be used to support these self-assessments. This research will help to define the criteria for differentiating between advanced and consultant practice.

During our discussions, however, it has become apparent that consultant level practice may not be limited solely to the clinical pharmacy domain, but could also apply to other pharmaceutical disciplines including, among others, medicines information, technical services, primary care and community practice. Indeed some groups have formulated their own competency frameworks and these could provide the detail to underpin the expert professional practice cluster as applied to each discipline. There is no doubt that the publication of “A vision for pharmacy services” and “Agenda for change” has given additional impetus to our work in this area.

At this stage, it is important that a consistent approach to developing general, advanced and consultant practice is adopted across the profession. We have informed both the Department of Health and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society on progress, responded to the Society’s consultation on “Competencies of the future pharmacy workforce” and are looking now to engage more fully with community pharmacy. We would welcome collaboration with individuals and organisations that have investigated, or are considering, issues in higher-level practice. The strategy, however, will not be meaningful if it becomes divorced from workforce planning and there is a clear need to establish the numbers of practitioners required at each level, the appropriate models of service delivery and the role of pharmacy support staff in those models.

David Webb
Director of Clinical Pharmacy
Graham Davies
Associate Director of Clinical Pharmacy
Duncan McRobbie
Pharmacy CHD Adviser
London, Eastern and South East Specialist Pharmacy Services

Ian Bates
Head of Educational Development
School of Pharmacy, University of London

Sotiris Antoniou
Principal Pharmacist
Naomi Meadows
Clinical Pharmacist
Barts and The London NHS Trust

Julia Wright
Head of Clinical Pharmacy
Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust

John Quinn
Chief Pharmacist
South Bucks NHS Trust

References
1. Davies JG, Webb DG, McRobbie D, Bates I. A competency-based approach to fitness for practice. Pharm J 2002;268:104–6 (PDF 60K)
2. McRobbie D, Webb DG, Bates I, Wright J, Davies JG. Assessment of clinical competence: designing a competence grid for junior pharmacists. Pharm Educ 2001;1:67–76.
3. Webb DG, Davies JG, Bates IP, McRobbie D, Antoniou S, Wright J, Quinn J. Competency framework improves the clinical practice of junior hospital pharmacists: interim results of the south of England trial. Int J Pharm Pract 2003;11(Suppl):R91 (PDF 45K)

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Fluoridation)

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal